czpl

7 ms·

1.
by czpl 6d ago
people who enjoy making it won't be able to afford to do it, alternatively only rich people will have means to do so. So I guess thats progress in some eyes
2.
by czpl 6d ago
Amazing or not, that is not the discussion. LLM output can look amazing as well but that's not what I'm arguing about. Also with LLM's we'll reach a point when everything is made out of samples (metaphorically speaking),
3.
by czpl 6d ago
How is it progress if it stops people from sharing. It just reduces everything to the lowest common denominator. Or how is it progress if the data centers just eat up all the components skyrocketing the prices for regular people.
4.
by czpl 6d ago
If a song was made purely of samples with no original input I'd argue it's in the same category. Maybe AI uses less of any individual song, but does AI make something actually original and transformative or is it just bits and pie
5.
by czpl 6d ago
there is nothing intelligent about an LLM
6.
by czpl 6d ago
Why are we glossing over the fact that it's all trained on stolen code, stolen art, stolen books? It's unethical to use it, it's unethical to take money for it. It should be either free or killed. I really don't understa
7.
by czpl 3mo ago
You can always install KOReader on Kindle to get the painless wireless transfer as well. It can even sync wirelessly with Calibre.
8.
by czpl 7mo ago
That's a light meter, not exposure compensation.
9.
by czpl 8mo ago
I'll believe it when I see it. So far time has shown the opposite is true.
10.
by czpl 8mo ago
polished product, and LLM generated code should not be put in the same conversation.
11.
by czpl 3y ago
at similar pressures as mexico city
12.
by czpl 3y ago
what about flying in planes then
13.
by czpl 3y ago
Can we go back to separate forums? That was a better time.