cyclopeanutopia

6 ms·

1.
by cyclopeanutopia 5d ago
> There are a lot of us who just use the AI on projects until the session limit hits, and wait for the usage to reset. Do you mean that you can't continue on your own until the reset?
2.
by cyclopeanutopia 5d ago
It's more about *finding* problems. And soon there won't be anyone who can do that, thanks to people lacking imagination.
3.
by cyclopeanutopia 5d ago
And who is "we" in your story?
4.
by cyclopeanutopia 6d ago
And then, when you really need them, it turns out that out of ten maybe one still works and you couldn't predict which one it will be. :)
5.
by cyclopeanutopia 6d ago
I have the same question, why OpenAI and Anthropic just don't release everything as open source?
6.
by cyclopeanutopia 7d ago
I got to > I am sure that OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra is top of mind for everyone right now. and closed the tab.
7.
by cyclopeanutopia 8d ago
Are you implying that Zuckerberg has a soul?
8.
by cyclopeanutopia 8d ago
But the whoreshippers of The Holy Dollar will tell you it's all good and justified.
9.
by cyclopeanutopia 8d ago
I'd say that believing to be "far ahead" is much deeper kind of coping.
10.
by cyclopeanutopia 8d ago
But their standards are so low - given the recent incidents - that it doesn't mean much. :)
11.
by cyclopeanutopia 11d ago
Basing this on what, if you care to share?
12.
by cyclopeanutopia 11d ago
One can't think only about the smartest people, but the whole population.
13.
by cyclopeanutopia 15d ago
It would require changing humans first.
14.
by cyclopeanutopia 16d ago
Why not use rpi then?
15.
by cyclopeanutopia 1mo ago
It's a reference to Fermat's note.
16.
by cyclopeanutopia 1mo ago
Got it.
17.
by cyclopeanutopia 1mo ago
Ok, notability is a good argument for having such an article (although I'm not too sure about it really being notable), but the current shape is absolutely misleading.
18.
by cyclopeanutopia 1mo ago
Yes, that's my point. Take any other award, list people who got it and had "incorrect beliefs", add an article about it and preamble it with "it is unclear whether it is an effect of the award". What purpose does it
19.
by cyclopeanutopia 1mo ago
From the examples given in this article it is absolutely impossible to tell whether the "incorrect beliefs" (be it racism, mushroom aliens, vitamins curing cancer, whatever) are in any way connected to the Nobel prize. For all I k
20.
by cyclopeanutopia 2mo ago
Yeah no, it would mean that most researchers and engineers are idiots without imagination and I don't believe this.
21.
by cyclopeanutopia 2mo ago
Or maybe researchers and engineers everywhere in the world, emboldened by such unprecedented move, will just refuse to participate in burning the world? "If we don't destroy the world, someone else will" is such a weak defens
22.
by cyclopeanutopia 2mo ago
No, I do. I truly believe - especially after seeing Mythos results at work - that the only way is to stop and destroy it all before it destroys us. In fact, it's already so bad that I'm moving completely offline all the important
23.
by cyclopeanutopia 2mo ago
It will be worse after consuming its own crap and poisoned sources.
24.
by cyclopeanutopia 2mo ago
"Naive" is a big understatement.
25.
by cyclopeanutopia 2mo ago
Here is one piece of evidence that would convince me: they admit they can't contain it, the they erase the weights and dismantle the company.
26.
by cyclopeanutopia 2mo ago
It should be, it's a corporation.
27.
by cyclopeanutopia 2mo ago
There is a growing lack of motivation.
28.
by cyclopeanutopia 2mo ago
Totally agree that the missing ingredient is making people want to learn. Which seems like something that gets harder every day.
29.
by cyclopeanutopia 2mo ago
> pretty addictive Is that good now? :(
30.
by cyclopeanutopia 2mo ago
Not really, it's about those stinky foot wraps. The idea is that the stink allows one to recognize that they are just spreading propaganda.

More ›