cyclonereef

5 ms·

1.
by cyclonereef 2mo ago
this is one of the few areas i feel like a blockchain-style solution could work. Mint a token, transfer it on sale or resale to the new wallet. Validate a wallet with the key is associated with the account. Same for old-school MSFT licenses
2.
by cyclonereef 3mo ago
I can only speak for myself here, but if I feel like I've read a whole paragraph that should have been half a sentence, that's my signal there's possibly AI generated content in there
3.
by cyclonereef 3mo ago
Got a referral to work as a Solution Architect at a company from the Senior Sales Person who I will literally be paired up with to talk to customers. Outgoing architect also said I would be perfect for the role. Got on a call with their int
4.
by cyclonereef 4mo ago
I've worked with plenty of companies that provide some sort of hosting for enterprise customers, and the number of times I've seen even senior admins use only CPU Utilisation and Memory In-Use investigating an issue is dishearteni
5.
by cyclonereef 4mo ago
The author mentioned this in passing: > The tasks were menial but doable: ferrying credentials between services, clicking Deploy, watching something fail, pasting the error back to Claude, repeating. It's no different to a company o
6.
by cyclonereef 5mo ago
I always gets the sense around a third of the way through his articles that whoever reads his drafts just gives up. It goes from wordy and repetitive to wordy, repetitive, filled with rage-bait exasperation and more filler than content. Giv
7.
by cyclonereef 5mo ago
It's the same sort of pedantry as correcting someone's use of their/there/they're. Yes, technically you're correct in what you're talking about, but arguing minutiae that is probably not relevant to the ov
8.
by cyclonereef 5mo ago
I'm going to call. This format of writing. Partial sentences. LinkedIn haiku.
9.
by cyclonereef 5mo ago
_allegedly_ Until there's evidence of the CVE's the model found and the severity of them etc. it's just a statement and "trust me bro" vibes wrapped in a PR puff piece
10.
by cyclonereef 6mo ago
His articles conflate quality with quantity. An aggressive edit with a more coherent structure would improve the message and sound less like a stream of consciousness rambling. Advertising his newsletter as "over 7000 words" is li
11.
by cyclonereef 11mo ago
Most of the time checking for "typical" thresholds for infrastructure will yield more noise than signal. By typical thresholds I mean things like CPU Usage %, Memory Consumed and so on. My typical recommendation for clients who wa
12.
by cyclonereef 1y ago
There's a point at which you need to actually specifically refer to what low-hanging fruit there is, "trust me bro" and "do your own research" shows you either don't know or don't have conviction in what y
13.
by cyclonereef 1y ago
Of those 800+ commits, how many were for the prompt progress capture as compared to the actual code? It also feels contradictory to state something was both "production ready" and in the next sentence say "respectable alpha v
14.
by cyclonereef 2y ago
The idea that there's a global cabal of ultra-wealthy real-estate owners who have globally conspired to control people to go back to the office holds about as much weight in my mind as the idea that there's a global cabal of ultra
15.
by cyclonereef 2y ago
Is it that Sun was particularly respectable, or that it disappeared before the current run of subscription-driven lock-in revenue strategies took off? I can't imagine any reason to think they wouldn't be doing the same thing as ev
16.
by cyclonereef 2y ago
I hope it was, but in taking a quick view at the authors other works, it seems like that's just his writing style