csfl

4 ms·

1.
by csfl 14y ago
Thank you
2.
by csfl 14y ago
> Who says anyone changed their opinion? I don't know what happened but I know the "awesome new guy" seems to be actually ok and very reasonable. He just fails to see the real point of the project and I think my cofounder is swayed too
3.
by csfl 14y ago
1) It's only verbal 2) I will probably try. It's not a technological project though. It's much more Twitter-like rather than nuclear-fusion-like. So the business and execution side is really important. It involves non-trivial technology but
4.
by csfl 14y ago
I've heard similar stories before, many ended much worse. Now I can appreciate much better that they really do happen :)
5.
by csfl 14y ago
We definitely could have been more efficient, we had a lot to learn. But the biggest problem I see is that we were still quite efficient producing features but not so much validating assumptions and developing customers/users (my stance: "l
6.
by csfl 14y ago
> What does he need a lawyer for? You have no agreements, no money, no incorporation. Maybe it was just his rushed reaction. He probably thinks I owe him continuing cooperation after we've been this long in it together. Maybe he would a
7.
by csfl 14y ago
Yes. That's what I am afraid of. Thanks for commenting
8.
by csfl 14y ago
The agreement on equity is 50/50. It's originally my idea and the stuff that's technically interesting in it is mostly my work. I very much doubt he could pull it off just by himself (technically). I'd have more technical chances of success
9.
by csfl 14y ago
1. He's working for the VCs (that's what he calls them I think it's rather a beginning startup accelerator) because they promised to invest in us if he helps them. 2. Well, he's sincerely convinced of his skills. That's part of the problem.
10.
Ask HN: Cofounder conflict, startup dying or dead for a long time already?
9 points by csfl 14y ago|25 comments