cryptoboy2283

6 ms·

1.
by cryptoboy2283 3mo ago
https://zanagrams.com/puzzles/5.json
2.
by cryptoboy2283 4mo ago
Signals I've got from this post: - Steve's company got acquihired by Amazon, granting him a free ticket in without all the torment of the multi-stage interview pipeline. - It's a well known fact that it's easier to jump
3.
by cryptoboy2283 7mo ago
Linkedin is already bot-only
4.
by cryptoboy2283 8mo ago
Earlier in 2010 - http://widgetsandshit.com/teddziuba/2010/10/taco-bell-progra...
5.
by cryptoboy2283 10mo ago
He's cooked
6.
by cryptoboy2283 11mo ago
AI slop
7.
by cryptoboy2283 1y ago
https://github.com/miguelgrinberg/microdot > Migrating to Microdot 2 You gotta be kidding...
8.
by cryptoboy2283 1y ago
No Elizabeth Line?
9.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
> Written by Product Manager at PARSIQ. Co-host at Basic Block podcast. Bitcoin, Ethereum, InfoSec. Everyone's a grifter nowadays, innit?
10.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
Become scrum masters
11.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
> The US-UK base will remain on Diego Garcia – a key factor enabling the deal to go forward at a time of growing geopolitical rivalries in the region between Western countries, India, and China. So nothing really changes lol. Just a coup
12.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
Oh god... another one of these digital preppers complaining about monetization by posting on Substack. Giant wall of cunning metaphors to attract reader's attention just to end with a literal flop at the end: > For now, I suppose, w
13.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
> Let’s say your company pays for 215 software products that cost us $420,000 a year to own and use. Nobody would object to somebody looking at that list of software finding redundancies and canceling those licenses. That's simply n
14.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
The level of entitlement in this post is ridiculous. Dude. You're just an engineer from an Engineering department of some company. Nobody's gonna read & apply any special rules of communnicating with you, especially written by
15.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
How does that contradict with the headline? They’re being successful in their mission
16.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
I'd also add: - writing everything in lowercase - helps reduce depression and anxiety
17.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
Thanks, this is helpful. Still kinda hilarious that their target for damage control is... Telegram. Musk and Dorsey never even mentioned it
18.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
> There is a group of people who just believes that crypto and privacy are good things and want to promote them. Doesn't mean one can't become a sellout eventually. Especially in Green's particular case - he had invested a
19.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
My theory is - Telegram gained some extra traction after Carlson's interview
20.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
Perhaps you're right, and all of them have the "greater good" intentions, but it's ridiculous how their "regular reminders" popped up in the same 24h interval
21.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
Are you pointing out that Mr. Durov is in conspiracy with... Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk?
22.
by cryptoboy2283 2y ago
So, who has actually launched "a pretty intense" campaign here? https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/17883860908411619... https://twitter.com/evacide/status/17880402763318
23.
by cryptoboy2283 3y ago
Great. Now what?
24.
by cryptoboy2283 3y ago
So... communists were right about things?
25.
by cryptoboy2283 3y ago
Kids?
26.
by cryptoboy2283 3y ago
Rule 18: Don't trust a Generic Wall Street Dude in a Suit, especially his own selling book (to be fair this is already mirrored in the several rules, Rule 8 and others)
27.
by cryptoboy2283 3y ago
It started pretty well, but the paragraph where you're comparing managers to the monarchy and nobility (!) made me laugh. You're clearly confusing cause & effect, to the unbelievable levels. Managers are hired by the corporate
28.
by cryptoboy2283 3y ago
Care to share an example?
29.
by cryptoboy2283 3y ago
"Western governments do dirty things behind the scenes? Dude, you're a conspiracy theorist!" "However, Kremlin psyops..."
30.
by cryptoboy2283 4y ago
You've forgot meta comment categorizing comments

More ›