crazynick4

5 ms·

1.
by crazynick4 5y ago
Maybe she has a subconscious conviction that she will live a long time even though she doesnt want to? The mind is a tricky thing..
2.
by crazynick4 5y ago
Do you think it is possible to maintain solar/wind for an extended period of time given the reliance on rare earth minerals that it would create? Also one argument that I haven't heard answered is how to handle the non-biodegradab
3.
by crazynick4 6y ago
I think volatility is an issue for any broker. Does RH wait to confirm an order until they find a counterparty or does their system just accept it and then find someone to clear it with after the fact? If it's the latter, and they find
4.
by crazynick4 6y ago
If they process an order 'late' the price change could swing in their favor and they would end up netting the difference. FXCM got caught for this in FX years ago, skimming fractions of pennies off the trades for millions in profi
5.
by crazynick4 6y ago
I am pretty sure they're a broker who hedges their positions with a counterparty. Otherwise, they would be taking on the risk themselves? But I think my math was backwards on the closing transaction. If the spreads widen they would tec
6.
by crazynick4 6y ago
Rh was probably losing money on widening spreads. If a client buys and holds and volatility increases and spreads widen, when the client closes out the trade, Rh will eat the difference in the spreads. If a client opens a short position and
7.
by crazynick4 6y ago
These are scientifically unsubstantiated claims but to claim that they are impossible is to go beyond the scope of the current science. We have a default stance on this, the 'null hypothesis' that states that these are not possibl
8.
by crazynick4 6y ago
I'm just saying that there should be a kind of agnosticism which 'pure' science is very conscious of and therefore chooses its words carefully when it says things like 'we have not found evidence for x'. This is ver
9.
by crazynick4 6y ago
Doing it.
10.
by crazynick4 6y ago
I think his point is that it would be more helpful to everyone if people remained agnostic to things that they haven't properly investigated instead of actively denying them simply because the research hasn't been done yet. This k
11.
by crazynick4 6y ago
The most convincing explanation that I heard was that by building up a tolerance in your body to carbon dioxide, you actually train your body to oxygenate itself better. CO2 dilates blood vessels and helps transport oxygen where it needs t
12.
by crazynick4 6y ago
So, the answer to that for you would be to just not go. Thailand is more than just one beach. Many people enjoy this party, I met one girl in Thailand who was a local and loved it, I don't see why you'd be happy about other people
13.
by crazynick4 6y ago
If it blocks plastic, what else might it block?
14.
by crazynick4 6y ago
Here are a couple studies I just googled https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4728953/ As far as personal experien
15.
by crazynick4 6y ago
Practice
16.
by crazynick4 7y ago
Have you actually read through these cases? Looking through all the cases in the 2000s they are all basically cases of hypochondria on a larger scale. There's no instances of mass independent sightings of UFOs there. Just because you c
17.
by crazynick4 7y ago
I'm not saying they don't have the right to curate, I'm just saying people shouldn't expect them to do so just to exclude fringe opinions.
18.
by crazynick4 7y ago
Yes, because they deserve to state their case like anybody else. If they're wrong, they'll be proven to be as much. Personally, I'm vaccinated for all the major stuff of course, but I don't do flu shots. A friend of mine
19.
by crazynick4 7y ago
MSM takes the same stance any time the US wants to go to war and, each time, the country invaded ends up worse off than it was under the dictator they had before.
20.
by crazynick4 7y ago
Yes, let's have Netflix and Amazon decide what is a legitimate view. If you don't like it don't watch it. Unless these films are actively calling for violence (I dont know if they are) I don't see what the problem is.
21.
by crazynick4 7y ago
Ok that's fine but should you change these politicians through what ends up being an essentially corrupt and biased process?
22.
by crazynick4 7y ago
I did not know that and that is reassuring.
23.
by crazynick4 7y ago
But you are arguing. Arguing without providing facts.
24.
by crazynick4 7y ago
What they're doing to him may be 'legal' but it's definitely antidemocratic.
25.
by crazynick4 7y ago
What points? You make it sound as if he stood to profit from this when the outcome has been clearly the opposite, and he himself had predicted it to be as much. His family has been getting death threats as a result of his work, and these ca
26.
by crazynick4 7y ago
Ethically, if the information is in the public interest, ie it exposes some corruption or something illegal that the government is doing that is a detriment to the people it's representing then I think the answer is obviously yes. Fro
27.
by crazynick4 7y ago
I was under the impression that people voted for Bolsonaro because they are fed up with a corrupt system. Lula de Silva (who actually was massively popular) was jailed for "corruption" in Operation Car Wash. However, as we now kno
28.
by crazynick4 7y ago
This is something journalists do all the time. If a source comes to you, even with illegally obtained materials, it is normal for a journalist to ask for more, that's their job.
29.
by crazynick4 7y ago
A peaceful protest that is non-cooperative in nature will eventually be noticed. If they leave when the authorities tell them to leave (Occupy Wall Street) then yes you are correct.
30.
by crazynick4 7y ago
So the people that weren't convinced by the scientists will now be convinced by the children? And no, she's not changing my mind because I already support protecting the environment.

More ›