Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
crazyhatfish
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
9y ago
I think sneak means Piknik doesn't.
2.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
9y ago
If you look at how much their demos in their gallery downloads, it's in the hundreds of kilobytes on average. Granted these are not full web apps but even still it's roughly on par with the latest web app framework's demos. P
3.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
9y ago
It is, the author is just saying that even without it they still have enough entropy in the system to be secure enough. Any old image doesn't have pretty strong random number generators in it.
4.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
9y ago
Actually, I don't think they state that is the only way they find content. I've had plenty of sites with obscure domain names for development and they always seem to find their way on to Google some how. I imagine in addition to p
5.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
9y ago
I seriously doubt that. Some sources have use of WinXP at 7 percent, it should be zero, and there are plenty of open, unpatched exploits for WinXP.
6.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
9y ago
They're already doing this, although for good currently. [ https://theintercept.com/2016/09/07/google-program-to-deradi... ]
7.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
9y ago
Do you use Python in production? It uses setjmp for its exception handling.
8.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
9y ago
Its Symantec, they run AV on thousands of computers across the globe. All the events generated from these computers get sent to them. Removal/cleaning procedures would be one of those events, probably for this very reason (i.e creator
9.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
10y ago
Although I'm not sure I would use this, this is the kind of stuff I've been waiting for. Where nice clean containers are used as part of an active dev cycle rather than just the production push. The ultimate dream of the end user
10.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
10y ago
They say in the takedown request that they want the uploaders IP and email to them down
11.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
10y ago
Have you experienced it? If so, where can I? I'm not saying its a bad idea, just that this direct path in implementation is. There are many other (better) ways of implementing it, like the Mozilla light sensor API. If that doesn't
12.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
10y ago
At the moment, nothing in a browser is direct access. Everything is abstracted, which includes the filesystem and geolocation. This provides a layer of security against massive horrible bugs in the OS. With WebUSB there seems to be very lit
13.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
10y ago
I don't think direct access to USB devices like your suggesting is a good step forward if for nothing other than practicalities. Think about how many individual USB light sensors your websites would have to support to enable this small
14.
▲
by
crazyhatfish
11y ago
Search inside a repo is still available just append /search to the url.