crat3r

10 ms·

1.
by crat3r 8mo ago
Because it is not even a remote exaggeration to say that in order to truly make the morally "correct" choices everyday, you would need to not participate in any part of society. Telling people to feel bad about eating animal prote
2.
by crat3r 8mo ago
So what then do you believe is a healthy diet? Surely eating animal protein on a regular basis is better than having to take a variety of unregulated supplements to stay within a healthy range of essential vitamins and minerals? Animal pr
3.
by crat3r 10mo ago
Three and four are both non-zero numbers. Zero constitutes the absence of value. Therefore, three and four are of the same value. You see the problem here, right? I'm not saying that fungi have not be recorded as having potential intel
4.
by crat3r 10mo ago
You think that a mushroom is more capable of intelligent thought and emotion driven decisions than a chicken? lmao
5.
by crat3r 10mo ago
If you ask it for anything outside of the standard 88 key set it falls short. For instance "Generate a piano, but have the left most key start at middle C, and the notes continue in the standard order up (D, E, F, G, ...) to the right
6.
by crat3r 1y ago
I feel like I still have yet to see any decent answers to this question; Are professional SDE paying for Claude on their own dime, and then logging into their personal account and somehow integrating Claude Code (or other LLMs) into their w
7.
by crat3r 1y ago
Sarcasm? Weird statement if not. I still have yet to replace a single application with an LLM, except for (ironically?) Google search. I still use all the same applications as part of my dev work/stack as I did in the early 2020's
8.
by crat3r 1y ago
"Seemingly" is the key word here. If the prompting didn't ask it to "act" and portray the scenario as something where it would be appropriate to "act" in seemingly malicious manner, would it have responded
9.
by crat3r 1y ago
If you ask an LLM to "act" like someone, and then give it context to the scenario, isn't it expected that it would be able to ascertain what someone in that position would "act" like and respond as such? I'm no
10.
by crat3r 1y ago
I want to be clear, I don't think Sora looks better. What I am saying is they both look AI generated to a fault, something I would have thought would be not as prominent at this point. I don't follow the video generation stuff, so
11.
by crat3r 1y ago
This doesn't look (any?) better than what was shown a year or two ago for the initial Sora release. I imagine video is a far tougher thing to model, but it's kind of weird how all these models are incapable of not looking like AI
12.
by crat3r 1y ago
What is the qualifier for this? Didn't one of the models recently create a "novel" algorithm for a math problem? I'm not sure this holds water anymore.
13.
by crat3r 1y ago
Fair, but I am seeing so much talk about how it is completing actual SDE tickets. Maybe not this model specifically, but to be honest I don't care about generating dummy data, I care about the claims that these newer models are on par
14.
by crat3r 1y ago
So, are people using these tools without the org they work for knowing? The amount of hoops I would have to jump through to get either of the smaller companies I have worked for since the AI boom to let me use a tool like this would make it