cpx86

5 ms·

1.
by cpx86 5mo ago
What if he starts sending his AI clone to the board meetings and it votes to fire him and replace him with itself? :P
2.
by cpx86 6mo ago
Oh absolutely, I would welcome some way of sponsoring such projects in general. I just meant to highlight that for this particular feature and project, there is already a form of sponsorship happening.
3.
by cpx86 6mo ago
When it comes to Wine, aren't they already doing this? Steam develops Proton in cooperation with CodeWeavers, who are the main sponsors of Wine, and parts of that work is upstreamed to the Wine project. The NTSYNC patch from what I can
4.
by cpx86 3y ago
That is an interesting argument. Do you believe that the same would apply to humans? I.e. if someone wishes to minimize the suffering of humans, is the logical conclusion that they should pursue omnicide?
5.
by cpx86 3y ago
FWIW the "Why?" page does a good job (IMHO) of what it is and what it's trying to achieve. Well-written, although perhaps not exactly concise. https://docs.endatabas.com/appendix/why.html
6.
by cpx86 5y ago
Oh that one - yeah I've always steered clear of DataContractJsonSerializer. Never understood why they did it so weird. To be fair, RFC 3339 wasn't even published back when this class was implemented (in .NET 3.5) so I guess they j
7.
by cpx86 5y ago
> That's why Microsoft got away with proprietary date formats in System.Text.Json. What's proprietary in it? It follows ISO 8601-1:2019 and RFC 3339 according to the docs.
8.
by cpx86 6y ago
This is just my very personal and subjective experience, which may or may not apply to your working environment since I've no idea how many developers or teams you have or how your responsibilities are defined. This is at least what I&
9.
by cpx86 6y ago
Exactly this. Treat the DB schema as you would any typical API schema. A lot of the techniques used for evolving application APIs can be used for sprocs and views as well, e.g. versioning for breaking changes, adding optional parameters or
10.
by cpx86 7y ago
> You'll spend more time & money on the OpEx cost with Kafka than picking up the client library for Pulsar. Could you elaborate why this would be the case?
11.
by cpx86 7y ago
C# didn't either, it was introduced in C#/.NET 2.0. As I've understood it, Java chose type erasure to stay backwards compatible with older JDK versions, whereas .NET instead chose to break compatibility with 1.x and force dep
12.
by cpx86 8y ago
One thing I think is worth considering is why you enjoyed coding to begin with? For some developers it seems to be the craft itself that gives them enjoyment, but IME they are relatively few, and for most people coding is simply a means to
13.
by cpx86 8y ago
I would expect to see at least some legal judgement against dark UX patterns. I was quite heavily involved on the technical side in GDPR compliance (EU company) and my understanding from the legal folks was that the regulation strictly forb
14.
by cpx86 9y ago
I can never resist naming Assembly variables ass. Also leads to lots of fun variations: dynamicAss, assBuilder, assTypes, ...
15.
by cpx86 9y ago
One big challenge I've found is the balance between standardization vs autonomy. E.g. monitoring, log formats, deployment, service discovery, etc are things that can benefit from being standardized across all services, but implementing