Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cootsnuck
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
cootsnuck
13d ago
Yea I don't get "load bearing" that much but "seams"... So sick of it.
2.
▲
by
cootsnuck
21d ago
If we fast forward say 5 years, I don't see how we don't end up in world where people (and enterprises) are more savvy with how they use LLMs. Meaning, more models, smaller models, weirder models, more specialized models, etc. And
3.
▲
by
cootsnuck
23d ago
This is going to increasingly happen over the years to come. Big organizations will become more sophisticated with operationalizing their data, training and running LLMs will continue to be demystified and accessible, and over time we'
4.
▲
by
cootsnuck
27d ago
CSAM and having the potential to randomly becoming unhinged due to strong alignment with the whims of the one dude? Surely puts enterprises at ease.
5.
▲
by
cootsnuck
1mo ago
> The industry is very much moving towards one-model-does-all end to end trained I've worked with hundreds of enterprises on voice AI and voice agent solutions. In my experience, this isn't true. Or rather I should say, the peo
6.
▲
by
cootsnuck
1mo ago
Which open source STT models have you had success with for fine tuning?
7.
▲
by
cootsnuck
1mo ago
That made me feel relief until I realized it's my own local PBS station.
8.
▲
by
cootsnuck
1mo ago
I would say even without rampocalypse there would still be the strong incentive to innovate at the edge and under more extreme constraints. The incentives are just even stronger now. I'm looking forward to seeing what types of new thin
9.
▲
by
cootsnuck
1mo ago
I think finding significant efficiency gains with LLMs and the like may lead to qualitatively better products. Looking at people's experiences to DSV4F makes me believe that even more than before too. I don't think people are real
10.
▲
by
cootsnuck
1mo ago
Betting on innovation continuing to figure out ways to squeeze more out of less has historically been the right move. Look at Apple. And I'd argue "hardware advances" are more proof of optimization.
11.
▲
by
cootsnuck
1mo ago
AIUC (AI Underwriting Company) is the only thing I've heard of: https://aiuc.com/ They're new. We'll see if it works out. (Just did a quick search and there are some other new entrants too. Just found out abo
12.
▲
by
cootsnuck
1mo ago
Please consider taking a break from your use of LLMs. You are clearly deep in the throes of AI psychosis and need to talk to people you trust in your life instead of the chatbots.
13.
▲
by
cootsnuck
2mo ago
What about your CEO actively spending their time pursuing their own creative interests and doing speaking gigs railing against AI? And posting them on the company YT and his own YT just a week before somberly announcing layoffs where you ci
14.
▲
by
cootsnuck
2mo ago
Saying that would be a much more reasonable layoff announcement. "Shit is good. But not that good. If we don't change course now, things may be less than good." If that's what they actually believe, they could just say
15.
▲
by
cootsnuck
2mo ago
Also I feel like people are not noticing in Tao's chat that chatGPT fairly often is doing web searches. So it literally is acting as search engine sometimes, and that too is incredibly effective when done right. So in addition to Tao u
16.
▲
by
cootsnuck
2mo ago
Interesting. I prefer video/audio for the same reason. But I watch most things on 1.5x or 1.8x speed. I'm not a particularly fast reader, so I prefer audio/video forms. Totally agree with you though about not thinking written
17.
▲
by
cootsnuck
2mo ago
So should I ditch ollama for this?
18.
▲
by
cootsnuck
2mo ago
Sincere question: have any non-Chinese models failed this one?
19.
▲
by
cootsnuck
2mo ago
You telling me your kids don't want a bowling alley?
20.
▲
by
cootsnuck
2mo ago
For just desktop, I use Handy (open source): https://handy.computer/ And yea, Nvidia's Parakeet v3 is good enough for my own just local transcription most of the time. When I need local transcription to be more reliabl
21.
▲
by
cootsnuck
2mo ago
You do know people aren't talking about fictional people being generated right? Actual, real-life, identifiable children. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/16/lawsuit-e... Very weird s
22.
▲
by
cootsnuck
2mo ago
For me, it was the fact that grok was a CSAM spewing faucet for weeks. And also the mecha-hitler thing. And also that one time it was weirdly aggrandizing Elon. I implement AI applications for enterprises (specifically in regulated sectors
23.
▲
by
cootsnuck
2mo ago
But this isn't a thread about ice cream...? It's about SoTA emerging technologies that pretty much everyone agrees is going to have consequential effects on society. When people say "don't talk about politics" that
24.
▲
by
cootsnuck
3mo ago
Yea but people invite actual humans into their homes who have names, faces, reputations, relationships, and some degree of social accountability. If I hire someone to come into my home I can meet them, decide whether I trust them, build fam
25.
▲
by
cootsnuck
3mo ago
Yea, the "doom trolling" seems to be starting to reach its limit. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/17/opinion/ai-dangerous-open...
26.
▲
by
cootsnuck
3mo ago
Hm, I just keep a folder called something like `status_docs/` in any project I work on and I create a new file in that folder any day I'm working on a project that's dated (e.g. `project/status_docs/2026_06_21_statu
27.
▲
by
cootsnuck
3mo ago
"Dangerous" is a loaded term. But yes, even "soundwaves" can cause harm, same way use of pharmacological medical interventions can cause harm. Dosage, application methods, side effects, etc. all exist for medical use of
28.
▲
by
cootsnuck
3mo ago
Yup, precisely. Turns out getting AI to be reliable at doing useful things is harder than we've all been led to believe by the dominant narratives. https://www.normaltech.ai/p/new-paper-towards-a-science-of-a...
29.
▲
by
cootsnuck
3mo ago
> Lets redefine work into discovering the world again. Let people do old handcraft jobs, let them do more sports, let them read more, let them write and make more. Let them enjoy nature. Why leave something so important up to what AI doe
30.
▲
by
cootsnuck
3mo ago
> I certainly don’t think individual cells have any subjective experience or sense of agency. There's definitely research and scholarship that would beg to disagree with you there. At least in terms of completely writing off the no
More ›