cookiemonster11

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by cookiemonster11 12y ago

   It confuses me that people make such a big deal of their little 20 lines of code toy projects.
2. 2.▲
   by cookiemonster11 12y ago

   It should.
3. 3.▲
   by cookiemonster11 12y ago

   There is, in the second sentence of the article.
4. 4.▲
   by cookiemonster11 12y ago

   "Zero, give or take measurement errors." Still does not make any sense. It's completely wrong.
5. 5.▲
   by cookiemonster11 12y ago

   This is not a TCP stack.
6. 6.▲
   by cookiemonster11 12y ago

   This is a bit of a stretch. Chemtrails are a baseless assumption. EM radiation has a measurable effect matter. Why not make valid points instead of insulting people?
7. 7.▲
   by cookiemonster11 12y ago

   WiFi APs do not have a power output of zero. Think about it for a minute, it makes no sense whatsoever.
8. 8.▲
   by cookiemonster11 12y ago

   Also, the device is probably passive, sniffing and logging, but not sending anything. Why would it?
9. 9.▲
   by cookiemonster11 12y ago

   Do you use a mobile phone?
10. 10.▲
    by cookiemonster11 12y ago

    The skepticism is very substantiated. Read John Baez' posts maybe? Or the Paper in question?
11. 11.▲
    by cookiemonster11 12y ago

    It's probably powered by N-rays.