connorshea

6 ms·

1.
by connorshea 5y ago
I've been using Sorbet on a personal project ( https://github.com/connorshea/vglist ) for almost two years now, and it's been great (although I've had to build myself a lot of tooling for it over time). I
2.
by connorshea 8y ago
This makes me so happy, thank you! :D
3.
by connorshea 8y ago
As a user of the iOS app it used to have some admittedly frustrating problems, but pretty much every complaint I had previously has since been fixed, huge kudos on the progress you've made! The only thing left that really bugs me is th
4.
by connorshea 9y ago
The issue in question for anyone curious: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/28996 I'm looking forward to it as well :)
5.
by connorshea 9y ago
Not OP but anything that makes the process smoother is good IMO :)
6.
by connorshea 9y ago
Libre/Starter/Premium/Ultimate are the names of plans for our distributions. CE and EE are distributions of GitLab. CE has _only_ FOSS code in it for users (e.g. self-hosting open source projects) who don’t want to run any pr
7.
by connorshea 9y ago
We also have an issue for running jobs only when modifications are made to a given file or files in a directory, it's tentatively scheduled for 10.7 (April's release). https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce&#
8.
by connorshea 9y ago
Not Sid, but thanks for being a fan ;)
9.
by connorshea 9y ago
Mirroring is an Enterprise Edition feature but there are probably ways to hack around that.
10.
by connorshea 9y ago
We actively try to make improvements so GitLab uses fewer resources, but with the scope of the application it's definitely not easy to make it super "lightweight". You can see the hardware requirements here: https:/&#x2
11.
by connorshea 9y ago
There are no plans to migrate all of GitLab to Go. The main Rails app is going to stay a Rails app for the foreseeable future. There are a few reasons for this. For one it'd be such a huge project, but also Rails is working well for us
12.
by connorshea 9y ago
Hey, sorry about that. I just replied.
13.
by connorshea 9y ago
See our Stewardship page[0] for how we determine what goes in EE vs. CE, for now Burndown Charts will stay in EE. As for EBS, feel free to open an issue for it[1] since I couldn't find one :) [0]: https://about.gitlab.com&#x
14.
by connorshea 9y ago
Thanks for the feedback, I looked into it and it looks like neither of these problems have been fixed as of yet. I've asked the CI and UX teams if we can work on the Environments page. Here's the issue for the table size: https:&
15.
by connorshea 9y ago
For what it's worth, in the last year (since January 23, 2017) we've merged ~440 merge requests labeled "performance"[0]. It's not perfect right now and there's still plenty of work to do, but compared to when
16.
by connorshea 9y ago
We do have support for macOS and Windows in Runner, though you'll have to run them yourselves. We're looking into offering hosted macOS and Windows Runners for the future, but we have no solid timeframe for those right now. https
17.
by connorshea 9y ago
I know you said you don't need them, but what features are we missing?
18.
by connorshea 9y ago
The current plan is to remove it in 11.0.0, if you know of anywhere this is unclear I can take a look and have it changed.
19.
by connorshea 9y ago
API v3 is still supported in the latest GitLab release (and will also be supported in this month's release, as well as probably the next few since we haven't decided the exact date of deprecation yet), have we communicated this in
20.
by connorshea 9y ago
Thanks, the Omnibus team has worked incredibly hard over the years to make GitLab easy to install :) Out of curiosity, is there anything we can do to make you a fan? What are we lacking?
21.
by connorshea 9y ago
When did you try GitLab, and was it self-hosted or GitLab.com? We've been working on improving performance, especially on GitLab.com, for the last two years now. Having started around then I can definitely say it was pretty miserable b
22.
by connorshea 9y ago
We have an issue for mailing lists in GitLab here[0] if you want to leave any comments, but it's not a particularly active issue and I'm not sure how likely we'd be to actually build this into the product. I'll update th
23.
by connorshea 9y ago
We have repository mirroring available in GitLab Enterprise Edition Starter, and there exists an issue to move this to CE[0] but it was closed with some explanation as to why[1]. I assume with GitHub Sync you're asking for syncing of m
24.
by connorshea 9y ago
Based on the Debian Wiki, plans have since changed[0] (unless this page is outdated?). That LWN article is from June, the wiki article was last edited in September. My understanding from the mailing list is that they're planning on usi
25.
by connorshea 9y ago
Their infrastructure tracker has a lot of interesting info about the move[0]. You can also read through the development mailing list, it has a lot of discussion about the GitLab migration. At GitLab we're tracking the blocking issues t
26.
by connorshea 9y ago
Could you link the issue so we can look into it?
27.
by connorshea 9y ago
Awesome news, now we can reconsider using GraphQL at GitLab! :) https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/34754#note_41... Out of curiosity, does anyone know of any other specs licensed under OWFa?
28.
by connorshea 9y ago
My understanding was that the maintainer of Gogs had stopped replying to any issues/PRs for a period of a few weeks and refused to add any other maintainers to the project, so people wanted to fork and ensure that it'd always have
29.
by connorshea 9y ago
Yeah, we've been committed to improving performance and uptime on GitLab.com for over a year now, we've heard this feedback a lot and take it to heart. It's definitely been steadily improving, and we're working on gettin
30.
by connorshea 9y ago
They don't load for me either, most likely a problem from when we rewrote most of the about.gitlab.com website last year. I'll look into it, I'm also interested to see what it looked like in 2012 :D EDIT: It looks like the im

More ›