connie_lingus

7 ms·

1.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
i don't watch tv so i don't know what you are talking about.
2.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
i'm sorry, but this simply flies in face of logic. it is absolutely morally wrong, but it certainly can be effective and has been used throughout history. usually, things that don't work don't last anywhere near that long. t
3.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
The CIA report threatens our legitimacy as a world power. no it does not...almost everyone in the world understand that under certain conditions, torture to get potentially life-saving information is just the way of things. let me put it
4.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
The FBI told Sony they didn't know if the theaters were safe. Seriously, WTF are we paying them for if they can't tell us, with absolute certainty, that our theaters are safe from terrorist attacks on Christmas. That's not v
5.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
Also, the Omnibus budget bill that was passed in the middle of the night that fed pork to every special interest who gave money to the candidates.
6.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
I think the truth could run in one of two directions. Todays news implied that Iran, China and North Korea were in cahoots and aggressively attacked Sony for months and finally penetrated their bastion. Sony was helpless to defend. That is
7.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
no it wouldn't, nor should it. US companies get hacked all the time...have you not been reading the internet over the past, oh, 10 years? also, there is still big doubts that the NK's did this.
8.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
i cant help but be reminded of the support-group addicts from Fight Club while reading the article.
9.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
> They can't outright claim they did it; because that would be an act of aggression. really? a nation-state attacking a for-profit multi-national corporation with little more than embarrassing information is an "act of aggressi
10.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
sony should just release the damned thing on christmas day on netflix and let the whole world deal with it at the same time.
11.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
yes...at a lower level i believe its called "confirmation bias" and we are all guilty of it, no matter how hard we try.
12.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
an impressive technical achievement, and kudos for the music.
13.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
"...They worry that the smart developer (who often shows up with a bit of an attitude) will overshadow the manager and our point out their weaknesses." lol...well you just described my last contract.
14.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
right, but remember what the companies are mostly paying for is the all the resources and reassurances of an IBM, not for the particular developer they are using to get the work done.
15.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
"Clients–the good ones, at least–don’t CARE how many hours you’re spending to do X and Y, as long as you’re doing a damn good job at X and Y and adding significant value to their company" amen...i've been discussing this conc
16.
by connie_lingus 12y ago
it would have been even better in a flying car i suppose.