computably

5 ms·

1.
by computably 7d ago
The post literally says > against Stockfish 18, this new release brings an Elo gain of up to 44 points, and wins more than three times as many game pairs as it loses.
2.
by computably 9d ago
Ah yes because copy-paste plagiarism is equivalent to writing original work...
3.
by computably 10d ago
> Nothing to do with some CEO's evil plans, but more to do with the hundreds/thousands of mid-level "not my job" or "doing my best" workers who are actually in charge of handling my data. The CEO is responsi
4.
by computably 12d ago
? That's a complete non sequitur.
5.
by computably 13d ago
> How much do you think an organization like Google would spend on, for example, AI tokens or compute to detect this internally before it was found and exploited in the wild? On average, probably not that much. What's the amortized
6.
by computably 13d ago
If you ballpark it as a single 3 hour downtime window per week and iid Poisson, then overlapping downtime probability of 2 providers is approximately the expected occurrence rate per 3 hours, 1/56. Not particularly surprising at all.
7.
by computably 15d ago
The law could make mergers executed provisionally for up to X years, with a binding plan to "unmerge" that must be updated every Y months. The FTC already half-does this with post-merge divestiture requirements.
8.
by computably 15d ago
> There’s only one way to interpret this. In any context, this is about as trivially false as any non-tautological statement can be.
9.
by computably 24d ago
Well, for one thing, you brought up the monster truck first. :) Anyways, I do agree that Nubank's growth is impressive.
10.
by computably 27d ago
It's based on the interpretation of "unreasonable" and while the current rules may be far from perfect I don't think interpreting routine border searches as categorically "unreasonable" is better.
11.
by computably 1mo ago
> Not attributing their success to their tech stack is just not knowing the facts. Touche. Though that's context you could've also included. > Arguing against Nubank's achievement is like insisting on a flat Earth. I&#x
12.
by computably 1mo ago
Uh, no? I highly doubt that a non-occluding watermark on screenshots is even in the top 100 gripes most people have with X. And I don't use either platform. If anything your argument is an accusation of bias without any discussion of m
13.
by computably 1mo ago
Security is never absolute, it always "merely" raises barriers.
14.
by computably 1mo ago
> Nubank (the largest digital bank in the world) using Clojure as their primary driver grew from ~12M customers in 2019 to 131M in 2025 - almost 1000% growth in less than a decade. JPMorgan that has about 80M customers took around 150 ye
15.
by computably 1mo ago
Their SWEs will all have Repetitive Strain Injuries long before they hit Recursive Self Improvement, I'm sure.
16.
by computably 1mo ago
> Likely yes, as you learn cooking now only by repeatedly cutting carrots the same way you always did but expanding your horizons to new cooking techniques and socializing in the niche will yield much bigger growth. You are not engaging
17.
by computably 1mo ago
> Did I not become better at raking leaves? Only in a sense which is obviously not at all what's being discussed. If you hire a personal chef, have you gotten better at cooking? What about a nanny, have you gotten better at raising
18.
by computably 1mo ago
"There is a view in some philosophical circles that anything that can be understood by people who have not studied philosophy is not profound enough to be worth saying. To the contrary, I suspect that whatever cannot be said clearly is
19.
by computably 1mo ago
That sounds superficially reasonable. The supply chain should be trustworthy and reliable.
20.
by computably 2mo ago
The title says "The coolest use for the Vision Pro," not "The Vision Pro is the coolest way to..." or even "The Vision Pro is worth the money."
21.
by computably 2mo ago
I didn't say it's all slop, I questioned the cause of maintenance burden. A critical question is how much time is spent distinguishing and rejecting slop. If all the reports are getting "very detailed and long," identify
22.
by computably 2mo ago
Why, what a fantastic idea! Maybe a certain trillionaire would be interested...
23.
by computably 2mo ago
Luxury for luxury's sake only covers the opposite extreme of essentials. Innovation often involves non-essentials, considered luxuries early on, and sometimes becoming so ubiquitous that they become new essentials, for better or worse.
24.
by computably 2mo ago
Spending their time patching, or reviewing slop "patches"?
25.
by computably 2mo ago
Of the examples I listed, only programming is a modern invention. Humans have certainly been making music and cooking for thousands of years.
26.
by computably 2mo ago
Sure, if you're shipping a 500MB mobile/web app with a 5s start-up, it probably won't make a difference today, or tomorrow, or 3 months later. The problem is when your codebase is a dumping ground for AI slop and a year from
27.
by computably 2mo ago
A term that gets tossed around in math is "mathematical maturity." It's similar to what you see in other fields - e.g. learning how to program, learning how to make music, learning how to cook - that involves many "aha&q
28.
by computably 2mo ago
The asymptote is log2(3) = 1.58496...
29.
by computably 2mo ago
That's a backwards argument. Flights in California between SF and LA will obviously travel a continuous line across California. Yes, the populated areas have light pollution, but that's because they're, y'know, populated
30.
by computably 2mo ago
Lol. The average American isn't ponying up $20/mo for the latest and greatest model. Barring major breakthroughs, being months ahead is a race to the bottom of who can burn more money to get 0.1% on a benchmark with no practical r

More ›