Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
compee
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
compee
14y ago
So would life be nothing more than universally good local viruses within the universe?
2.
▲
by
compee
14y ago
You say this and you don't give him a serious response. >As someone with physics training I do not see physicists having this trouble What is definitively known about mass besides E = mc^2 and the limited information we now about the Hi
3.
▲
by
compee
14y ago
I would imagine because if you don't have a product completed before Demo Day (even a completed prototype that works, of sorts) there is no value to show potential investors.
4.
▲
by
compee
14y ago
I work with mathematics applied to various applied computer science problems with a couple startups. If anyone is interested in learning a bit of mathematics to structure programs (for real-world usage, even!) feel free to let me know what
5.
▲
by
compee
14y ago
You are stating all of this within the context that the governments should have nuclear weapons. The people (around the world) should have free and open nuclear power. Just because we have nuclear weapons does not mean we should have to use
6.
▲
by
compee
14y ago
Would you mind explicitly stating the flaw in my argument instead of directing me to some website? I can (and often do) read articles of this nature but with a title of "Pro Gun Myths" I'd rather cut out any potential bias and hear your dir
7.
▲
by
compee
14y ago
I honestly don't see any direct correlation with regards to what you are trying to say. Could you elaborate? The only reason to have weapons (in a primitive sense) is for killing animals for food and for certain games related to specific ty
8.
▲
by
compee
14y ago
It would be worth mentioning that to develop nuclear weapons there would be a need to develop them, for something. If we could just step back for a moment and ask the simple question of "Why do we need nuclear weapons?" there is no good rea
9.
▲
by
compee
14y ago
The question to ask from here (for you US readers) -- why ban american civilians from owning the same types of weapons as the government allows the military to? In the spirit of the constitution it seems as though our founding fathers would