commmentator

8 ms·

1.
by commmentator 1y ago
Definitely agree. A frank postmortem would be a good thing to see.
2.
by commmentator 1y ago
You'll note that Proton's PR only mentions the second date - " last one on Sep 6 with a 48-hour deadline." Proton doesn't mention that the first email from Phrack which Proton ignored was weeks prior to that, which
3.
How Elon Musk Says He Catches Leakers at His Companies(theintercept.com)
6 points by commmentator 4y ago|0 comments
4.
Musk's Twitter takeover could endanger vulnerable users(reuters.com)
7 points by commmentator 4y ago|3 comments
5.
Ask HN: Why Is Instagram Killing Itself?
3 points by commmentator 4y ago|4 comments
6.
As California sizzles, Amazon drivers feel the heat over metrics(news.trust.org)
1 points by commmentator 4y ago|0 comments
7.
by commmentator 4y ago
> you're accessing content paid for by adverts, but you aren't contributing to that payment. If the content is paid for by adverts, then of course I am not contributing to that payment. Because I am not an advertising company,
8.
by commmentator 4y ago
> Why do I earn money if not to buy things? To create a safety net for yourself (and perhaps your family)? So that if you were to incur unexpected catastrophic expenses, or lose your job, you would still be able to sustain yourself?
9.
by commmentator 4y ago
> it's the only wildly prevalent, fairly minimal hassle way to make micro-payments to a service/content I'm benefiting from. To see the absurdity of this position just replace "view ads" with the following: I wou
10.
by commmentator 4y ago
> even if its pretty clear at this point some of his scores are dodgy. "dodgy"? Quite the understatement there. This man has made fraudulent claims, has held fraudulent records and, most importantly, has sued people who told th