comfyinnernet

7 ms·

1.
by comfyinnernet 5y ago
Apparently Bezos is worried that someone out there might not know he's a dickhead yet.
2.
by comfyinnernet 5y ago
This will go nowhere and everyone involved will be working for Apple and Google in a few years' time.
3.
by comfyinnernet 5y ago
>DNR as currently implemented by Chrome does not yet meet the needs of extension developers. "Yet"?
4.
by comfyinnernet 5y ago
I thought I'd seen bad analogies before, but I had no idea what was possible.
5.
by comfyinnernet 5y ago
I read the description of a "self-authoring" mind. Can someone ELI5 how it differs from the description of a "psychopath"?
6.
by comfyinnernet 5y ago
I wonder who's spouse, in-law or sibling will get most of that £222m.
7.
by comfyinnernet 5y ago
I feel like I wasn't supposed to see that.
8.
by comfyinnernet 5y ago
This is written in the style of someone who spends 20 straight hours at a time edit-warring on a wiki.
9.
by comfyinnernet 5y ago
It means, "offensive or repugnant to NFSN," which is a reasonable definition for them to be using imho.
10.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
>At Google there were interviews exactly like what Manara prepared us for: data structures & algorithms problem-solving. I'm surprised this hasn't become the main point of discussion here yet. Edit: I mean Google's int
11.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
Someone should paste Zuckerberg's face in the middle of the logo whenever they see one of those.
12.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
It's probably that vibranium deposit. I saw a film about it.
13.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
Facial recognition software to count board members? Would that be applauded?
14.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
>Certainly I think ... covids and some other groups, show that intelligence is rather easy to come by Oh shit I hope not!
15.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
I don't think you would need exact duplication for these situations to arise.
16.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
Youtube is the problem. Anyone can put whatever shit they want online, which is fine in itself, but put your snake oil on Youtube and Google's Skynet will expertly find rubes to sell for you and show it to them. But on a few occasions,
17.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
Maybe! The real problem is to help people avoid people they want to avoid, not banning clients on technical grounds. A genuine attempt at solving the problem wouldn't be based on universal bans. There could be groups who have their own
18.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
Is cancelling your nose really a price worth paying?
19.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
It doesn't even matter whether someone is cheating. All that matters is whether they're ruining the game. You don't need a rootkit to determine that.
20.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
You forgot to use cowsay.
21.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
"a world where a certain subset of people with the technical knowledge have computing freedom" Even that is optimistic.
22.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
We're making good progress toward a world without sharks. We can do it!
23.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
"In some cases, this means you may get advertising in the mail" It's nice to know Google is concerned about this dystopian possibility.
24.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
People like to talk about technology saving us, but there is only one technology that can stop climate change now. I can't remember what it's called though. It's kind of a big wooden frame with a big metal thing that slides v
25.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
I think you proved the parent's point.
26.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
It's the AT-5000 auto-dialer all over again.
27.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
I can't tell if the joke is deliberate.
28.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
If the police are acting like Judge Dredd and murdering people then a weak and ineffective police force is exactly what you have.
29.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
Either you think America used to have Soviet style communism, or you have serious reading comprehension problems, or you're a parodist.
30.
by comfyinnernet 6y ago
"Facebook did not answer questions about why a partner manager would cite ad volume as a reason for not acting against a group of pages." Oops somebody said the thing out loud.

More ›