Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
codyvoda
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
counterpoint: influencers said they wiped the floor with everyone so it must have happened
2.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
it’s not magic. it can make meaningful contributions (if you actually invest in learning the tools + best practices for using them) you’re taking an anecdote and blowing it out of proportion to fit your preformed opinion. yes, when you star
3.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
is that what I said? if you can’t read documentation and follow basic instructions to get a tool to work you’re stupid. you asked a snarky question like it’s some gotcha. once again, if you actually use the tool and read the docs and can’t
4.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
it can do this step. once again, this launched 2 days ago and people are using it for the first time if you have used it for more than a few hours (or literally just read the docs) and aren’t stupid, you know this is easily solved you’re gi
5.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
because we react like this engineers are testing promising new technology. a mob (of probably half or more bots) is having a [redacted] perpetuating the anti-narrative they huffed themselves up into believing . and now we’re in a meta-[red
6.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
why does every engineer keep talking about it like it’s more than marketing hype? why do you actually accept this is a real narrative real people believe? have you talked to the executives implementing these strategies? redbull does not giv
7.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
and you think this beta system that launched like 2 days ago can’t achieve that? it also opens the PR as its working session. there are a lot of dials, and a lot of redditor-ass opinions from people who don’t use or understand the tech
8.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
the code goes through a PR review process like any other? what are you talking about?
9.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
this entire thread is very reddit-y this stuff works. it takes effort and learning. it’s not going to magically solve high-complexity tasks (or even low-complexity ones) without investment. having people use it, learn how it works, and impr
10.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
or press “a”
11.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
eh terminology happens. I’d argue we shouldn’t be using “AI”, but here we are. I’d prefer encouraging “vibe coding” to mean this over fighting against the wind
12.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
yeah Microsoft could never conceivably develop an extensible source available IDE people love so much they even fork to build $3B companies on the scraps of. absolutely alien!
13.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
given that they lose >$4B/year I guess everything is peanuts
14.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
it happens on practically every topic. this was technologically not possible 100 years ago and it’ll be fascinating to watch play out. stfu and listen is a legit skill in 2025
15.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
…then you’re a malicious person possibly committing fraud/theft and the airline is incompetent and shouldn’t be used once its idiocy becomes public knowledge? the fundamentals of how the world works doesn’t change here lol wtf are we t
16.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
Eldo Kim you stand out when you obviously hide
17.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
sure I’d just say it’s a Cursor alternative :shrug:
18.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
is this a Claude Code alternative? seems way more GUI-focused Codex is OSS (and Aider of course) and serve as decent alternatives
19.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
this is also from 2008 lol
20.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
yep if you can think in the terminal (scripts, files, pipes) you can automate anything + the minimalism in the age of ad-les enshittification is refreshing
21.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
that’s not what I said or the argument I’m making
22.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
…and? people do stupid things and face consequences? so what? I’d also advocate you don’t expose your unsecured database to the public internet
23.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
sure but we’re talking about literal text, not physical drugs or bomb making materials. censorship is silly for LLMs and “jailbreaking” as a concept for LLMs is silly. this entire line of discussion is silly
24.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
^I like email as an analogy if I send a death threat over gmail, I am responsible, not google if you use LLMs to make bombs or spam hate speech, you’re responsible. it’s not a terribly hard concept and yeah “AI safety” tends to be a joke in
25.
▲
by
codyvoda
1y ago
talk is cheap, show me the vehicle I can purchase that works well
26.
▲
by
codyvoda
2y ago
I think this is the one benefit of recent "AI" advancements, it accelerates the downfall with even cheaper garbage. death to the internet, long live the internet
27.
▲
by
codyvoda
2y ago
these are almost entirely unrelated problems
28.
▲
by
codyvoda
2y ago
we will take this excellent marketing advise under advisement, thank you for your consideration
29.
▲
by
codyvoda
2y ago
this is a blog for the Ibis project, directly from one of the main developers/maintainers of the project, about deprecating two (of 20+) backends the project supports and giving the justification as a project, we're big on using t
30.
▲
by
codyvoda
2y ago
this is a huge difference between Ibis (and really, any dataframe library that works with larger-than-RAM or distributed engines) and pandas. PySpark, Polars, and Snowpark all to some extent also do not implicitly order your data so in Ibis
More ›