coder9874

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by coder9874 3y ago

   Thanks for diving into the evidence for us. It's an important lesson not to believe everything you read on HN.
2. 2.▲
   by coder9874 3y ago

   Yep it's down. Why do they even bother with the status page
3. 3.▲
   by coder9874 3y ago

   This is an entirely valid model, and many startups would be better served by following it. Still, the whole point of (larger) VC funding rounds is facilitate rapid growth, far more than 40% year over year. There's no contradiction betw
4. 4.▲
   by coder9874 3y ago

   Good luck avoiding every single venture-funded company. Can you give an example of such a "monopoly"? Vercel? They have plenty of competitors, all they are doing is charging a premium for convenience. There will always be alternat
5. 5.▲
   by coder9874 3y ago

   Just my 2c as a startup guy - this is patently absurd. VC's would not just write checks for millions again after such huge losses. Many, many startups would shut down and the entire startup/VC ecosystem would be devastated.
6. 6.▲
   by coder9874 4y ago

   I'm afraid that you're wrong. See page 11. https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/stanfordlanguag... . Stanford seems to have beaten the "anti-woke trolls" at their own game.