cloudhead

7 ms·

31.
by cloudhead 11mo ago
Thanks for the encouragement!
32.
by cloudhead 11mo ago
Thanks for your comment! In terms of concurrent programming in Radiance, it's likely I go for something inspired by Go's simplicity and Haskell's power with STM[0]. Actors are also on the table, but likely as a library on top
33.
by cloudhead 11mo ago
What's odd is how certain people seem to be about their intuition about what is and isn't written by an LLM.
34.
by cloudhead 11mo ago
Gotta keep trying then!
35.
by cloudhead 11mo ago
Yes, R' is "R prime", unrelated to the statistics language. Honestly didn't think about it that much.
36.
by cloudhead 11mo ago
Thanks for these thoughts -- I agree in principle, but we have to juggle a couple things here: while Radiant is in some ways an experiment, it isn't a research project. There are enough "obvious" things we can do better this
37.
by cloudhead 11mo ago
I think it's phrased that way because he's saying it would be great to have as long as you don't spend too much time on it. Doing it by hand would probably not be worth it, but if a tool can do it, then it's worth it.
38.
by cloudhead 11mo ago
That’s the point — I and others would have the opposite reaction, it’s self selecting, so it’s doing its job. I didn’t even read the article because I thought “boring, nothing special about a CTO who codes, we all do.”
39.
by cloudhead 1y ago
The web interface is also so laggy on Firefox I’ve started using other free offerings more despite paying for Claude..
40.
by cloudhead 1y ago
Why is this article written as if programs have feelings?
41.
by cloudhead 1y ago
This.
42.
by cloudhead 1y ago
Fiio has a bunch of products in this category, eg. https://www.fiio.com/cp13 and https://www.fiio.com/jm21
43.
by cloudhead 2y ago
I wish rust took inspiration.. Same story regarding moving away from llvm.
44.
by cloudhead 2y ago
Just because you prompt an LLM doesn’t mean it ain’t programming. The job will just change from using programming languages to using natural languages. There is no silver bullet.
45.
by cloudhead 2y ago
A mind map is a specific type of concept map, where the edges are labeled
46.
by cloudhead 2y ago
Thank god the world doesn’t actually work this way..
47.
by cloudhead 2y ago
This doesn’t solve the supply chain security issue mentioned.
48.
by cloudhead 2y ago
Even better would be to have some of the basics in the standard library, like Go and Zig.
49.
by cloudhead 2y ago
So are people going to jail?
50.
by cloudhead 2y ago
Low quality post that doesn’t understand how DIDs work.
51.
by cloudhead 3y ago
It's optimized for certain workloads around code collab, so for now we don't want to oversell it. It doesn't have to be coupled with Git, though Git is very efficient at synchronizing changes. The protocol currently can be
52.
by cloudhead 3y ago
Interesting idea, thanks!
53.
by cloudhead 3y ago
The difference is that the repository id is stable, while the maintainer keys can change.
54.
by cloudhead 3y ago
No plans to do so - firstly we’d have to rewrite it in C, and second it would be a big amount of code for the Git project to merge.
55.
by cloudhead 3y ago
We tried. At first we built it on top of IPFS. It was much too slow. BitTorrent is interesting but we need a way to have mutability (repos change all the time). So we built the networking layer ourselves and the forge on top of that.
56.
by cloudhead 3y ago
Contributions to the repo have to abide to both licenses, derivative work gets to choose only one.
57.
by cloudhead 3y ago
It’s simple: I don’t want my code and code collaborators to be using a platform owned and controlled by a third party. Just like I don’t want my OS or text editor, kitchen, furniture, clothing, books or music to be controlled by a third par
58.
by cloudhead 3y ago
The repository id can be derived via a hash function from the initial set of maintainers, so all you need to know is that you have the correct repository id. The advantage of this is that (a) it verifies that the code is properly signed by
59.
by cloudhead 3y ago
Can’t debate that :)
60.
by cloudhead 3y ago
Understandably! We are working on packages for Linux and macOS.

More ›