clj_throwaway

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by clj_throwaway 6y ago

   Banks and fintech often view their in-house tech as competitive advantages, and they usually don't care a whit about building cred in dev communities (a common reason why projects are OSS in the first place, to drive recruitment or pro
2. 2.▲
   by clj_throwaway 6y ago

   We all know the history of acquihires. Key tech and products inevitably are swallowed, never seen outside again. Besides that, datomic really is a great solution for banks and fintech....are other firms like that going to buy from another b
3. 3.▲
   by clj_throwaway 6y ago

   Outside of the license, OF COURSE Relevance, then Cognitect, now nubank owns clojure, in every other way that matters. Now do datomic :-)
4. 4.▲
   by clj_throwaway 6y ago

   If you asked me that 15 years ago, I'd say "no". In hindsight, it sort of makes sense given their objective of increasing time spent online and the quality of the experience. The proposition here is that nubank will be the fi
5. 5.▲
   by clj_throwaway 6y ago

   Yep, telecomms and banks, very similar dynamics and incentives /s
6. 6.▲
   by clj_throwaway 6y ago

   Throwaway account, for obvious reasons. This is great for nubank, but how is this supposed to work for other users of Clojure and Datomic? Who is really going to be interested in building on top of tech owned by a (new, unknown, regional) b