clevercode

4 ms·

1.
by clevercode 16y ago
Agreed. Also, sentences like "I mastered the ability to combine several strategies, each with varying strengths and weaknesses, highlighting the strengths and nullifying the weaknesses" are no good. What strengths? What weaknesses? When I r
2.
by clevercode 16y ago
One recent development in the field of artificial neural networks is "Deep Learning": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdIURAu1-aU&feature=playe... !
3.
by clevercode 16y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_D...
4.
by clevercode 16y ago
True, but that fact only becomes useful after you already have it running on a virtual machine. Chicken-and-egg problem.
5.
by clevercode 16y ago
Recreating the source code by itself does not, in this case, constitute a "model". In order to actually run that binary, you also need to create a virtual computer for it to inhabit.
6.
by clevercode 16y ago
By "looping", I'm assuming you mean "recurrent"? If so, you might be interested these: http://www.idsia.ch/~juergen/rnn.html http://www.lsm.tugraz.at/learning/framework.html http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.31.6.
7.
Animated evolution of recurrent neural network state space(clevercode.blogspot.com)
1 points by clevercode 17y ago|1 comments
8.
by clevercode 17y ago
The first study you link to does not appear to address the correlation/causation issue whatsoever. Specifically: "The study acknowledges that people who regularly run marathons, like many of the study's participants, may be genetically pred
9.
by clevercode 17y ago
I wonder how much of this is simply due to poker's recent surge in popularity, thus creating a much larger pool of potential talent to draw from.
10.
by clevercode 17y ago
A possible (somewhat sci-fi) future extension to this idea would be directly monitoring the brain of the subject, in conjunction with eye movements, in an attempt to quickly detect a subconscious signal of 'recognition' while scanning the c
11.
by clevercode 17y ago
I heartily agree with your skepticism. In my opinion, rather than attempting to simulate progressively larger brains, we should instead focus on really nailing the details of smaller ones, perhaps starting with insects. As an example, Porti
12.
by clevercode 17y ago
Interesting idea! I wonder if that's why I always feel so much more awake and focused after taking a shower?
13.
by clevercode 17y ago
I agree that analysis of neural networks is not easy, but there are certainly ways to do it: there is no way to find out the relative significance of the input variables and how they affect the output response Calculate partial derivative
14.
by clevercode 17y ago
What worked for me was proper diet and exercise. I used to suffer from pretty bad panic attacks that would occur randomly, and it was really debilitating. The thing that really helped me was taking up jogging. Some form of daily exercise
15.
by clevercode 17y ago
I agree with you in principle, however, their simulations are approximations, not identical. From their website FAQ: Q: Do you believe a computer can ever be an exact simulation of the human brain? A: This is neither likely nor necessary
16.
by clevercode 18y ago
I'm very curious if, during this demonstration, you were actually allowed to directly interact with the system or not?
17.
by clevercode 18y ago
I got 97% on 'Particle Pro'
18.
by clevercode 18y ago
You are correct, I should have read more carefully.
19.
by clevercode 18y ago
Nevermind, you cited it in your paper... :P
20.
by clevercode 18y ago
Neat stuff! One thing you might want to look into (if you haven't already) is Probabilistic Incremental Program Evolution (PIPE) by Schmidhuber.