cle

6 ms·

1.
by cle 23d ago
The VA had her own account on the Team plan.
2.
by cle 24d ago
My wife's startup made the mistake of building her internal operations around Claude Team. Then she hired a VA in the Philippines. Anthropic promptly banned her account without warning once the VA connected to the account. It took her
3.
by cle 4mo ago
The security model and runtime requirements are completely different between making an HTTP request and executing arbitrary code. They have different tradeoffs.
4.
by cle 5mo ago
What? I get so much joy out of learning the details of careers of people in different industries than me. I had an hourlong conversation with someone the other day who is in the high-end rug business…where he sources from, how he deals with
5.
by cle 7mo ago
GP didn't say it's not a problem and not worth fixing. They're claiming this is not a good fix.
6.
by cle 8mo ago
> The issue is that "83 per second" is multiple orders of magnitude off the expected level of performance on any RDBMS running on anything resembling modern hardware. This is just not true, there are so many scenarios where 83&
7.
by cle 8mo ago
Americans think "supporting universities" is not necessarily the same as "supporting science."
8.
by cle 8mo ago
This comes up every time this conversation occurs. Yes, PG can theoretically handle just about anything with the right configuration, schema, architecture, etc. Finding that right configuration is not trivial. Even dedicated frameworks like
9.
by cle 11mo ago
There are good arguments for it, but it's also not a coincidence that they happen to align with Google's business objectives. Ex it's hard to issue a TLS cert without notifying Google of it.
10.
by cle 11mo ago
That will not work with many of the world's most important documents because of information density. For example, dense tables or tables with lots of row/col spans, or complex forms with checkboxess, complex real-world formatting
11.
by cle 11mo ago
> How many degrees of freedom do you real need to represent API cost. The amount that your users care about. At a large enough scale, users will care about the cost differences between extraction and classification (very different!) and
12.
by cle 1y ago
I write these as part of my job, I know how they work. I'm not going to spend more time explaining to you (and demonstrating!) what is in the spec. Read the spec and let the authors know that they don't understand what they wrote.
13.
by cle 1y ago
I'd encourage you to read the MCP specification: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-06-18/ser... Or write a simple MCP server and a client that uses it. FastMCP is easy: https://gof
14.
by cle 1y ago
What you described is essentially how it works. The LLM has no control over how the inputs & outputs are validated, nor in how the result is fed back into it. The MCP interface (Claude Code in this case) is doing the schema checks. Clau
15.
by cle 1y ago
Every time the LLM uses this tool, the response schema is validated--deterministically. The LLM will never see a non-integer value as output from the tool.
16.
by cle 1y ago
Generally you'd use a time library to model ISO-8601 dates in a typesafe way. Some fancier languages might have syntactic support for it, but they ultimately serve the same purpose. Related but distinct from serialization.
17.
by cle 1y ago
This is deterministic, it is validating the response using a JSON Schema validator and refusing to pass it to an LLM inference. I can't gaurantee that behavior will remain the same more than any other software. But all this happens bef
18.
by cle 1y ago
I just tried this in Claude Code. I made an MCP server whose tool output is declared as an integer but it returns a string at runtime. Claude Code validated the response against the schema and did not pass the response to the LLM. te
19.
by cle 1y ago
I don't understand this criticism by the author. MCP supports JSON Schema, and server responses must conform to the schema. If the schema requires an ISO-8601 timestamp (ex by specifying a "date" format in the schema) but the
20.
by cle 1y ago
For me the battle is with people who want to waste time bikeshedding over the definition of "REST" and whether the APIs are "RESTful", with no practical advantages, and then having to steer the conversation--and their mo
21.
by cle 1y ago
"Everyone should support education" is an empty platitude, it doesn't help answer questions like "how much funding?" and "who gets funding and who doesn't?". That's where the sides arise. The aut
22.
by cle 1y ago
Cursor does all that stuff too perfectly fine.
23.
by cle 1y ago
Meanwhile multiple non-technical people that I know pay $20/mo to OpenAI and have long, verbal conversations with ChatGPT every day to learn new things, explore ideas, reflect, etc. These are obviously what voice assistants should do,
24.
by cle 1y ago
How does that eliminate the need for the graceful shutdown the author discusses?
25.
by cle 1y ago
Thank you for the details. I've no doubt that tariffs are having impacts. Was looking at that specific data and finding it hard to conclude with just that data . Does CNY also explain the Week 16->17 drop in 2024?
26.
by cle 1y ago
I would love to have conversations with folks about the details and learn more about it. The CNY mention was helpful.
27.
by cle 1y ago
> They have much superior product compared to VSCode in terms of pretty much everything, except AI Disagree, I keep trying Jetbrains once in a while and keep walking away disappointed (used to be a hardcore user). I use VS Code bc it is
28.
by cle 1y ago
Week 9->10 2025 had a 35% drop too. And Week 9->10 2024 had a 45% drop and a 26% drop Week 16->17 2024. Starting to wonder how significant this news really is?
29.
by cle 1y ago
Purists perpetually decry the zeitgeist's sloppy terminology. Words that climb the Zipf curve get squeezed for maximum compression, even at the cost of technical correctness. Entropy > pedantry. Resisting it only Streisands the shor
30.
by cle 1y ago
It’s too early to call winners. It definitely has more than “nothing” though.

More ›