classicpsy

6 ms·

1.
Ask HN: Will this setup work or is it just adding complexity?
1 points by classicpsy 2mo ago|0 comments
2.
by classicpsy 6mo ago
Thanks for the pointer. For now I’ve fixed the issue. Your reply made me go through the hook script solution more carefully, and I’m exploring it now.
3.
by classicpsy 6mo ago
Now it is convincing. But the same approach a week ago frustrated me. The problem was some guy in office wrote the logs, and it was somehow logging success even though it was going in the catch block due to an error. But the claude was conv
4.
by classicpsy 6mo ago
Mate I still didn't understand that. stop hook forces the claude to run the existing tests. Fine if claude added a new feature but didn't created a test for it. It will wait for it to perform that action. Fine. We can adjust the c
5.
by classicpsy 6mo ago
> We're building feature X. - You might need `a`, `b`, `c`. (any libraries, url documentation etc) - The requirements are: - x - y - z So, you are saying we have to start every conversation for an existing project wi
6.
by classicpsy 6mo ago
Looks an interesting approach. So, the tests being written are based on what? on user input or to test the changes it made according to claude's analogy? If it is the latter, it can be the same problem of forcing its analogy. In this c
7.
Ask HN: How to Handle Claude's Stubbornness?
9 points by classicpsy 6mo ago|10 comments
8.
by classicpsy 6mo ago
That sounds relatable, but there are ways through which we can avoid being lazy. As for myself, I occasionally try to debug and fix the code myself instead of relying on coding tools. That doesn't give superhuman feeling like writing a
9.
by classicpsy 6mo ago
I tried it. Looks great. Just few refinements from my side. - Undo is not working. If you applied something it will be done. I had to reupload the pdf to again make the changes. - I tried the text editing, it is having a defualt font family