Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
class4behavior
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
1.
▲
by
class4behavior
4mo ago
Then write and highlight exactly that! ( e.g. "Never copy or execute code you do not understand! This is only for people who already know what will happen! Confirm:") Forget about teaching people bad patterns. It's annoying w
2.
▲
by
class4behavior
4mo ago
> “The easy route for us would be just to cut off foreign involvement entirely and not include foreign authors. And that to us is a concession to some form of xenophobia.” I mean, what else so you expect if you elect a majority of actual
3.
▲
by
class4behavior
5mo ago
You're interpreting my post with the assumption that I don't know what I'm talking about. You don't need to explain the protocol to me. Domain here referred to the area of influence or control, like what the provider of
4.
▲
Cisco vs. DOE – SCOTUS to further narrow judgements on the international law
(scotusblog.com)
5 points
by
class4behavior
5mo ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
class4behavior
5mo ago
Although the Manus decision might change things for AI, Singapore-washing is quite rampant among Chinese companies, so I wouldn't call this place of origin an alternative market.
6.
▲
by
class4behavior
5mo ago
Calling AP services a bunch of small "centralized" services in this context removes all the meaning from that term. You might as well call any web server centralized while comparing them to clouds. Proper federation is exactly suc
7.
▲
by
class4behavior
5mo ago
ATProto simply ignores the need for decentralizing incentives on a human/community level. What we get is a sort of a "top-down" federation rather than a grass-roots one. Whoever invests in the infra ends up running a domain.
8.
▲
by
class4behavior
5mo ago
Inclusivity is secondary here. Moreover, it's just fallacious to argue the nation has to give up on its own rights and principles and be content with whatever the market provides.
9.
▲
by
class4behavior
5mo ago
There's a big difference between having to run a particular company's OS and being forced to share private data (whether that's merely your DNS requests or your ID documents and full financial history). with said organization
10.
▲
by
class4behavior
5mo ago
Your disdain isn't helpinh you here either as you're just as wrong as parent. Such public utilities ought to always prioritize privacy, platform-independence, and empowering market competion long- and short-term. And to achieve th
11.
▲
by
class4behavior
10mo ago
Tell me why all MMOs are crap or just fail and as a result turned into a gambling institution.
12.
▲
by
class4behavior
11mo ago
Anyone's basic expectation is that your sourcedis a valid one, but like Wikipedia is not a source and neither are LLMs/MMMs.
13.
▲
by
class4behavior
11mo ago
JfC, this is so confidently wrong, it's absurd.
14.
▲
by
class4behavior
2y ago
It's really sad no one just looks up the legal principles conservatives are pushing forward together with Trump. Here, it's the unified executive theory, which is based on how the US system had worked for its first century. Same w
15.
▲
by
class4behavior
2y ago
Misleading headline: It's productivity loss caused by non-essential data collection. The EU does not mandate banners, it's the businesses choosing to bully their customers into accepting all tracking and profiling.
16.
▲
by
class4behavior
2y ago
Privacy is not about secrets. Privacy is the right to sovereignty over one's personal/intimate sphere - whether it's insight to information about oneself or physical contact. The right to consent, for instance, would be a com
17.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
The crowd stagnates. Everyone looks to the right, to the left. After a moment of thought they turn around: "Democracy-destroying ad-hell it is then."
18.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
Is it the rendering or the selection of fonts?
19.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
The withdrawal also once again established that the nation doesn't care about its responsibility and the consequences of its actions (Iraq -> Daesh, AF->Taliban and all achieved progress and hope ruined), only its own costs and t
20.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
When it comes to AI, I'm less interested in the aspect of copyright infringement - it's more of an anti-trust issue, imho - as in the privacy concerns that the tech enables, but if you can forbid reverse engineering of your produc
21.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
Let's not pretend Americans did not eat up all his philanthropy in the name of the children, thus boosting his influence in politics: https://www.reddit.com/r/nextfuckinglevel/comments/qrx02w/sh...
22.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
I get that someone would do it anyway, but why would the poster want to be the one helping an authoritarian entity fix these loopholes? smh
23.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
Sure, but how does that address what I said? As I just argued, due diligence wouldn't have uncovered any surprises. It's merely that Elon could have used the process to ascertain what consequences the acquisition would have for hi
24.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
You need first to understand a perspective before you judge it. That's what cultural difference is and a lot of it is at play here. Good or bad, this is a different style of life. Not to mention that it is not unusual for executives or
25.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
Due diligence usually refers to the review of the asset you're trying to acquire. There weren't any significant surprises about Twitter's state. Elon's issue was Elon.
26.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
You won't get far with that approach in communication with such people on social media. That is, assuming the fault isn't with you, if you're on the spectrum, for instance, etc. As you correctly realized yourself it is not co
27.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
Whether research is generally undifferentiated, as you claim, is not the same as specific research that proves that screen time is undifferentiated. In other words, are you saying there are no such evidence as parent asserted?
28.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
It's betraying the word shameful in that it's an utter understatement. If people don't care about supporting companies that enable and spread far-right content and groups, it's they who are a problem. To say nothing of t
29.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
It's 5 and 10 in AUS/NZ, 15 in Canada, 10 in the UK, 15 in the EU, 10 in Sweden, 20 in France, etc. for normal adults
30.
▲
by
class4behavior
3y ago
>In most countries You claim this based on what data?
More ›