Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cinntaile
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
cinntaile
4d ago
What are the equivalent numbers in the EU? Be sure to compare the same numbers. Usually they're in MtCO2e and not in MtCO2 like in that PDF.
2.
▲
by
cinntaile
5d ago
Yes, penguin conservationists do this to scam the penguins... You didn't really think that one through did you.
3.
▲
by
cinntaile
8d ago
Sure, why not.
4.
▲
by
cinntaile
10d ago
You have very simple fume extractors. I don't get why it would not be worth it just because you rarely do it. It's like wearing a respirator mask when using a grinder. Or ear muffs when drilling or sawing.
5.
▲
by
cinntaile
16d ago
Perhaps you could try addressing the arguments instead of irrelevantly focusing on Harvard?
6.
▲
by
cinntaile
18d ago
As I understand it, you're an investor in Featherless. It's good to mention that.
7.
▲
by
cinntaile
19d ago
That one went right above your head.
8.
▲
by
cinntaile
28d ago
I don't understand. What's special about being able to charge your phone? Can't you do that anywhere you have a power socket?
9.
▲
by
cinntaile
1mo ago
I think you would need something that tracks relevant per cable metrics over time to see if it is degrading. That one just says yes/no, but maybe yes/no starts to flicker around its end of life?
10.
▲
by
cinntaile
1mo ago
Your sibling comment is right. It stands for Levelized Cost Of Electricity.
11.
▲
by
cinntaile
1mo ago
You could try using arguments instead of an appeal to authority fallacy?
12.
▲
by
cinntaile
1mo ago
It's not as clear cut as you describe it here. In the other old thread you linked there was no real consensus if this should be considered a backdoor or not.
13.
▲
by
cinntaile
1mo ago
There is no such thing as the Renaissance Fund. Quanta receives funds from the Simons Foundation... I also don't know where you get it from that Renaissance Technologies is heavily invested in AI. Any sources to back up your claims bec
14.
▲
by
cinntaile
1mo ago
Another commenter already mentioned that it's more likely a lack of compute and funding that forces their hand to focus on niche tasks.
15.
▲
by
cinntaile
1mo ago
Why does it say 0 for the US? You have Thanksgiving, Christmas, 4th of July and more? Are they unpaid days off?
16.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
That would be Sv, not SV.
17.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
I don't see how that's relevant, my original post made no safety claims.
18.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
I don't find it ideologically inconvenient, I just don't think it's a realistic take. There are situations for power generation where fossil fuels are the only viable alternatives hence why I mentioned them. Now if you had in
19.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
A bit of a weird tangent? You can tell them yourself. You are free to reuse my sentence if it helps.
20.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
It's unsafe so it's never a good fit? That kind of reasoning is just noise. Unsafe for what? Compared to what? What alternatives, given the constraints, exist?
21.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
I can access court decisions just fine and I'm not in the US, so no. It's not. The chances are not very high that you are well-versed in how all the other countries in the world work. Whenever you think something is unique, it is
22.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
It's not going to reduce any time soon. Either way the reality is that sometimes fossil fuel power plants make sense, that's why they're still being built.
23.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
> Americans know because we can access our US court decisions, unlike any other country in the world. This is not a uniquely US thing?
24.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
> It depends on what you are optimizing for and what is geographically, (geo)politically and economically possible. I mentioned all of this in my message. What was unclear about it or did you perhaps not read past the first sentence?
25.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
I don't know what you mean with "no safe level of fossil fuel use". It doesn't mean anything without contextualizing that statement.
26.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
People arguing for one alternative over the other are usually politically motivated. I feel like you are doing the same. Sometimes nuclear is a good fit, sometimes renewables is a good fit, sometimes fossil fuels are a good fit. Most of the
27.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
Did I miss something? When did Spacex get into the fab business?
28.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
I think the no action results speak for themselves. I'm not sure what there is to disagree about to be honest.
29.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
Nobody is pressing charges because nothing happened. It wasn't nefarious either. I don't get what France has to do with this Huggingface and OpenAI are both US companies.
30.
▲
by
cinntaile
2mo ago
They paywalled it before LLMs.
More ›