chucke1992

6 ms·

1.
by chucke1992 2y ago
Open source is about standards. If for example USA uses chinese algorithms or whatever, if China discovered some drawbacks in it and did not disclose it originally - it can be used as a weapon.
2.
by chucke1992 2y ago
when they started they already had everything that was created. before them and they have no moat.
3.
by chucke1992 2y ago
C++ has much more bigger inertia. It is like the "default" for all the areas where it is being used. So when learning a language people would rather go to C++ first and then to Rust, if they are really planning to work in correspo
4.
by chucke1992 2y ago
I think Google will be broken up during the next couple of years.
5.
by chucke1992 2y ago
I wonder how much of it goes into "pension funds". As long as Mercedes (and any other old car companies) as not cutting their staff and pipelines, they will never be competitive with Tesla or Chinese companies. They have a lot of
6.
by chucke1992 2y ago
No, but with big market share comes big responsibility. Video streaming is extremely unprofitable sure, but in its care it tries to leverage its market share with Chrome browser to benefit. And you are not allowed to do that when your marke
7.
by chucke1992 2y ago
It also does not help that Google is often seen together with various left leaning initiatives - like Google is one of the big proponents. Plus there was some backlash on Twitter over Youtube hiding Joe Rogan video and so on.
8.
by chucke1992 2y ago
I think with Trump's administration Google will have a tough time.
9.
by chucke1992 2y ago
Google has to be dismantled in parts one way or another - too much control over search and Youtube to the point where they are able to enforce Chrome standards that prevent adblocks from working.
10.
by chucke1992 2y ago
Twitter algorithmic feeds are designed to promote engagement even if you don'like something. It is important because more engagement with various content, means more clicks, more reactions and so on. You get something you like, you get
11.
by chucke1992 2y ago
I see BlueSky getting some traction regarding some specialized discussions (akin Discord?), but Twitter will continue to be the public space to go.
12.
by chucke1992 2y ago
All these advantages are only due to the fact that it has less users and thus it is cheaper to run it and less need to monetize it.
13.
by chucke1992 2y ago
I am personally curious into what Linked will devolve eventually.
14.
by chucke1992 2y ago
happiness ends when your economy goes down the drain.
15.
by chucke1992 2y ago
I am not talking about the legacy. The legacy will live one - I mean technically the world has changed post 2016 and it has not gone back since then. And it won't. With 2024 it might change the landscape more.
16.
by chucke1992 2y ago
due to amount of regulations it is hard to start business in europe and thus they mainly have old business (like BMW etc.) that are in decline. but innovation happens in other places. There are two exceptions though - France (partially) and
17.
by chucke1992 2y ago
Yeah, well essentially republican went through 2 transformations over the last 8 years.
18.
by chucke1992 2y ago
Trump is too old at this point.
19.
by chucke1992 2y ago
Considering how Google was suppressing the stuff related to elections - not showing Rogan's video, not showing directions (and was called out multiple times by Twitter and Musk) to voting locations etc. I don't think the new admis
20.
by chucke1992 2y ago
they will probably merge FTC back into DOJ
21.
by chucke1992 2y ago
[flagged]
22.
by chucke1992 2y ago
Harris has zero charisma. She cannot talk without creepy laugh or jokes that nobody laughs at, she can't work with crowds. She was in primaries some time ago and gain less than 10% votes.
23.
by chucke1992 2y ago
yeah. I think they have did some refactoring in OS though, to make it more modular. Not sure what are their long term plans for Windows. They probably would have benefitted from some handheld UI for sure.
24.
by chucke1992 2y ago
This Github purchase was incredible
25.
by chucke1992 2y ago
The problem with Amazon is not their closeness to Anthropic, but more of the fact their moat is not big enough to integrate AI in a way MSFT can. Even their Azure services somehow feels natural with AI support. I don't know if Satya pr
26.
by chucke1992 2y ago
The thing is that OS is not important these days as you can apps on thin clients now and a lot of folks are spending most of the time within apps and doing nothing else.
27.
by chucke1992 2y ago
> for Microsoft, internet, mobile and AI I don't think they missed AI boat. Their culture would not have allowed them to create OpenAI, but they were fast to leverage their moat and push AI into their office and windows suites and a
28.
by chucke1992 2y ago
Yeah. It is basically a trap that every CFO who became CEO step into - tie everything to a single thing. With Satya he had much broader vision.
29.
by chucke1992 2y ago
> Microsoft under Ballmer was insanely profitable, more than its competitors and far more than before he took the helm. Being profitable means nothing if your marketshare in low 10%. You are leaning too much on "profit". Ballme
30.
by chucke1992 2y ago
> Microsoft under Ballmer was insanely profitable, more than its competitors and far more than before he took the helm. Yeah, that's the thing - he was a good CFO. He was able to maximize profit and stuff. But people remember CEOs b

More ›