chronic71819

5 ms·

1.
by chronic71819 7y ago
> It is not infallible and it does not reveal truths that people are 'worried' about seeing, it's a reflection of current mindsets. And who are you to say if the machine's output (ie, mindset) is to be trusted? Machin
2.
by chronic71819 7y ago
Climate change is happening and accelerated by humans. We just don't give a shit.
3.
by chronic71819 7y ago
Okay so then we'll just change the state birds? Not that many people care about the environment.
4.
by chronic71819 7y ago
Good for Prague. We need more European countries/cities standing up to China.
5.
by chronic71819 7y ago
> Will it? Because nobody gives a fuck about Palestine, and Israel is not suffering much (or at all) because of what they did and do. Unfortunately I agree with you. Very few people in the US even care about Israel/Palestine. I don&
6.
by chronic71819 7y ago
> The kind of infrared you're thinking of is probably not the kind the sensor can detect. Only thermal imaging cameras Parent is talking about far-infrared (ie, thermal) sensors. Many car models have high-resolution thermal sensors.
7.
by chronic71819 7y ago
Censor: Highly targeted and specific, usually along the lines of communication. Like Xi and Winnie the Pooh. The US doesn't censor(?) Blacklist: Broader, usually applied to products and companies. China blacklisted Facebook. The US bla
8.
by chronic71819 7y ago
> See if it's possible to earn a profit without selling out. Unfortunately it's not possible. Nearly everyone on HN would rather invest in a total stock market index fund, simply because it gives better returns. How much differ
9.
by chronic71819 7y ago
> 1.4 billion of those people are Chinese, and they can get outaged over whatever ridiculous shit they want. Only in your own thoughts and dreams (for now). You're not allowed to outrage on Weibo or WeChat. Is this correct?
10.
by chronic71819 7y ago
> Iceland is a figment of my imagination? > And Costa Rica? > And most individual countries in Europe? All of these countries, for practical purposes, do not exist. They do not have influence on the world stage. They may as well be
11.
by chronic71819 7y ago
> It's incredible to me that graduating college students, many presumably with student debt and little savings, can even consider taking the financial risk of starting a company (e.g. forgoing a salary). When I visited the Stanford
12.
by chronic71819 7y ago
> You're saying the only people entitled to live on desirable land are wealthy assholes coming from afar? Rich or poor, asshole or not asshole: No one is entitled to live anywhere. There is only a market price. That's all.
13.
by chronic71819 7y ago
> The parent comment was “if you want this policy, tough shit move to Europe”. If the policy is popular here, why doesn’t parent comment move? If you want rent control, I'm saying you should go elsewhere. If you are against rent con
14.
by chronic71819 7y ago
> Until there's a better solution than "tough shit" these policies will continue to be popular. Why do we need a better solution than "tough shit"? Not everyone is entitled to live where they want. If you want th
15.
by chronic71819 7y ago
> Opt-out for GDPR is under 1%. Most people don't care at the moment, sadly. Correct. On top of that, many people on HN, aware of the privacy implications, continue to have a Google Home / Alexa in their homes. Myself included.
16.
by chronic71819 7y ago
> Google Fi is expensive for individuals. Their initial premise was $20 base for unlimited text/phone and $10 / Gb. Pixel 3 user here. I pay $30/month on average. What on Earth are you torrenting on your phone? I've n