Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
chronc6393
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
1.
▲
by
chronc6393
4mo ago
> They're going to want some sort of analysis And I want $1 billion dollars. Doesn’t mean someone’s going to give it to me.
2.
▲
by
chronc6393
5mo ago
> The practice — supported by artificial intelligence and known as dynamic pricing or surveillance pricing — can lead to two consumers paying different amounts for the same item from the same retailer, at roughly the same time. Is an if-
3.
▲
by
chronc6393
5mo ago
> Scientists who might have come to the US three years ago have little reason to do so now. Been saying that about EU and China for decades now. Yet the top European and Chinese still come to the US. Even in April 2026.
4.
▲
by
chronc6393
5mo ago
mic drop
5.
▲
by
chronc6393
5mo ago
> Let's see how long it takes before the big US AI companies start lobbying to outright ban use of Chinese AI, even the open source / local models. For "national security" reasons, of course. Already do on EVs.
6.
▲
by
chronc6393
5mo ago
> The US supports the genocide in Gaza, it supports the bombing of Lebanon. The US itself has now started (another) war and bombed Iran. > With Trump they are now openly hostile to European democracies, and ICE and doing their best at
7.
▲
by
chronc6393
6mo ago
> People have been convinced of that my entire life, and I'm old now. People in the UK still think they are the #1 superpower today
8.
▲
by
chronc6393
6mo ago
> It has more to do with gold is now worth almost 3x what it was 2 years ago. And why is it worth 3x? But S&P500 is not?
9.
▲
by
chronc6393
6mo ago
lol you conveniently left out 50% of the ticket fees
10.
▲
by
chronc6393
6mo ago
> Better this than slinging Tomahawks at school children. I’d rather the one be slinging tomahawks, than the one receiving tomahawks because my country decided to reduce military spending.
11.
▲
by
chronc6393
6mo ago
> One does not “simply” reduce spending. Why does stock price go up after mass layoffs?
12.
▲
by
chronc6393
6mo ago
> what profits are you talking about to offset the losses? You don’t need profit to offset the losses. You can simply reduce spending / expenses.
13.
▲
by
chronc6393
6mo ago
> When it becomes a bigger problem, other indices with higher quality controls will out compete the current ones and be used by asset managers seeking safety Doubt it. The world does not allow perfect competition.
14.
▲
by
chronc6393
6mo ago
> Hi Nick, your software is a horrendous encroachment on users' privacy and its quality is subpar to those of us who know what we're working with. We don't use your product here. It’s ok, OpenAI is cooked. Feel bad for any