chroma205

23 ms·

1.
by chroma205 8mo ago
> Are you a financial analyst by any chance, because the "here's a few facts, interpret how that's going to impact the market yourself" is very on-brand. What do you want him to say? 1. De-dollarization is all Trump’s
2.
by chroma205 8mo ago
> Has Nadella had one original thought? He simply passes through whatever the board orders. No. But for mega-tech CEO salary, I’d probably do exactly the same.
3.
by chroma205 8mo ago
> You can have all the weird lifestyle preferences you want that don't involve conspicuous waste of natural resources and accelerating anthropogenic climate change. you’re right. but I’m still not changing my habits. fuck the enviro
4.
by chroma205 8mo ago
> and several people with mortgages and children made it happen. Solution seems to be don’t have kids. Then the employees are less scared of losing their jobs and can push back against management’s idiotic AI requests.
5.
by chroma205 8mo ago
> You will pay a cloud subscription to perform anything remotely computationally taxing. What’s wrong with that?
6.
by chroma205 9mo ago
>Agreed. Even xAI's (Grok's) access to live data on x.com and millions of live video inputs from Tesla is a moat not enjoyed by OpenAI. Tesla does not have live video feed from (every) Tesla car.
7.
by chroma205 9mo ago
> Fines should be designed to make it uneconomical to continue to reoffend. Great. Fine me $1 million, and I will fight the case with lawyers, thus slowing down the public legal system for thousands of other legal cases, whether traffic
8.
by chroma205 9mo ago
> The term for that is false advertising. No different than Elon Musk claiming self-driving will be deployed to all Teslas in 2017; 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026.
9.
by chroma205 9mo ago
> I so much hate it that we have built an economy where companies believe the best way forward is to cram ads into everything instead of building better products. Blame the consumers. They don’t want to pay for monthly subscriptions beca
10.
by chroma205 9mo ago
> They are also tied for first for having the highest cost of living. Who cares? Absolute savings rate and net worth are what matter. Any European will gladly live in America for US$1 million/year income even if the cost of living i
11.
by chroma205 9mo ago
> Being pompous and self obsessed requires none of those things. Sufficient, but not necessary
12.
by chroma205 9mo ago
> The next step forward has been to stop moving scooters to power and instead bring power closer to where vehicles operate. Asia already has swappable batteries not just for bikes and scooters, but also motorcycles and even some cars. Th
13.
by chroma205 9mo ago
> You just made sure only people who can afford to live near work are hired. And what’s wrong with that? Is every person on earth entitled to a job? If yes, voice your concern with your local government.
14.
by chroma205 9mo ago
> I've always assumed peer review is similar to diff review. Where I'm willing to sign my name onto the work of others. If I approve a diff/pr and it takes down prod. It's just as much my fault, no? No. Modern peer re
15.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> There are no exchanges where market makers get any kind of priority to bypass the FIFO queue. Nope, several large, active, and liquid markets in the US. Legally it’s not named “bypass the FIFO queue”. That would be dumb. In practice, i
16.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> That sentence alone tells me that you're a LARPer cope. Equity options are sparse and have 1 order of 1 lot/qty per price. But usually empty. Too many prices and expiration dates. US treasury bond cash futures (BrokerTec) are
17.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> If you actually were in the industry, you would know that most retail traders don't fail, because they lose a tick here or there on execution Where did I say “retail trader”? Because “institutional” low-latency market makers trade
18.
by chroma205 10mo ago
>but for various reasons can end up flopping when actually executed in the real market. 1. Your order can legally be “front run” by the lead or designated market maker who receives priority trade matching, bypassing the normal FIFO queue
19.
by chroma205 10mo ago
>We gave each of five LLMs $100K in paper money Stopped reading after “paper money” Source: quant trader. paper trading does not incorporate market impact
20.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> you can write all you want about an AI bubble Bubble =/= useless Bubble means over-hyped
21.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> Were Xerox, Dec, or Apple burning investor money by the billions of dollars? Shhh. You are not allowed to ruin OpenAI’s PPU value. Can’t make the E7’s feel bad.
22.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> I guess that's mostly true, but why does Jane Street get to have a moat in models but LLM companies can't? Common misconception by people outside quant trading. Modern “alpha” in trading does not come from better models but r
23.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> A citizen being rounded up by the state and bundled off to a foreign country illegally and with no process is absolutely kidnapping regardless of how much you want to pretend otherwise. You realize half of Americans literally don’t car
24.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> If Apple can build an ad system within the app store, I don't see why OpenAI can't do that for ChatGPT. Because Apple iPhone users have no alternative. But Google Gemini is right there for Gmail, Google Docs, and Google Works
25.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> What makes you think this couldn't make money? Because advertisers will use Gemini instead. Advertisers already have established relationships and business processes with Google account managers. Why bother starting from scratch w
26.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> The real danger imo is that it could subtly manipulate you during conversations no shit
27.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> MIT Report Claims 11.7% of U.S. Labor Can Be Replaced with Existing AI Trying to keep the bubble alive
28.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> Yeah, ChatGPT is dead now. Not dead yet. But definitely bleeding. CharGPT lost 15-20% market share to Gemini in second half of 2025.
29.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> 99% of users having no idea what "export chat history" means? Yet Google Chrome managed to make Safari/Edge irrelevant.
30.
by chroma205 10mo ago
> The answer is friction. Yet non-technical users switched from Edge/Safari to Google Chrome.

More ›