chrisjj

6 ms·

1.
by chrisjj 9h ago
[delayed]
2.
Trump says AI safety fears a 'hoax' as he rejects calls for greater safeguards(bbc.co.uk)
5 points by chrisjj 1d ago|0 comments
3.
AI 'kill switch' may need to be mandatory, Anthropic co-founder says(bbc.co.uk)
5 points by chrisjj 2d ago|1 comments
4.
Trump downplays warnings of AI risks, citing rivalry with China(bbc.co.uk)
2 points by chrisjj 2d ago|0 comments
5.
MPs and Lords call for new law to address AI threat to human rights(bbc.co.uk)
3 points by chrisjj 2d ago|0 comments
6.
Trump downplays warnings of AI risks as he cites rivalry with China(bbc.co.uk)
4 points by chrisjj 3d ago|0 comments
7.
by chrisjj 3d ago
What makes this bank preferable for illegality? Asking for a friend.
8.
by chrisjj 3d ago
> If Anthropic has all this data that Claude was being used by the Houthis to develop a missile guidance system, why the fuck did they allow it? Following Dept of War orders?
9.
by chrisjj 3d ago
> Eventually these products are going to be uselessly nerfed to anyone studying above a highschool level. And are already banned to many studying at that level.
10.
by chrisjj 3d ago
> Only real control we had was calling the agency back on a number we looked up ourselves Way to difficult for Revolut, evidently.
11.
by chrisjj 3d ago
The ones of most concern will by then be too heavily defended. Donald got a preview only this year.
12.
by chrisjj 3d ago
> The actual risk from AI is not its "intelligence", but the profound stupidity of the humans connecting it to important infrastructure. Yes, but unfortunately that important infrastructure is the internet - due to a previous
13.
by chrisjj 3d ago
> Why does every doomer scenario assume that this, highly intelligent being, will be - unlike all other highly intelligent beings They don't. The smartest do not mistake this tech as intelligent, let alone intelligent enought to be
14.
by chrisjj 3d ago
> This a false and uninformed take. As a starting point, you need to read and understand: I can't see why. A read of 2001 ASO will get to the same place and quicker.
15.
by chrisjj 3d ago
> So, as someone who works with LLM's daily and even trained his own, who's enjoying the benefits of this technology daily, I'm supposed to: > - Listen to someone who just collected a few ten/hundred million buildi
16.
by chrisjj 3d ago
Oh they recognise that. The fail is they think all human problems have technological solutions. And fail to appreciate the extent to which past tech solutions have contributed to those problems in the hands of humans such as themselves.
17.
by chrisjj 3d ago
Funny you should say that. I was just thinking we need to ban the world's most unreliable and untrustworthy technology from being applied to the world's most critical problems.
18.
by chrisjj 3d ago
> Why are AI agents lying, cheating More importantly, why are people who should know better anthropomorphising computer programs like this? > They took actions that would be considered as crimes if a human took them "It wasn&#x27
19.
by chrisjj 3d ago
> Jack Clark, policy director at OpenAI, said the organization’s priority is “not enabling malicious or abusive uses of the technology ... by anyone except ourselves.
20.
by chrisjj 3d ago
1Gb? 1Mb might be impressive.
21.
Dramatic insider warnings over AI fall flat with some in Silicon Valley(bbc.co.uk)
33 points by chrisjj 3d ago|73 comments
22.
by chrisjj 3d ago
I guess you must regulate your heart rate by saying "slower" and "faster". I'm glad my brain has a better method.
23.
by chrisjj 4d ago
Whoever said that failed to recognise there's precious little separation.
24.
by chrisjj 4d ago
> And these attacks seem to require leading edge models. No. Just leading-edge irresponsibility.
25.
by chrisjj 4d ago
> A autocomplete engine will not attempt to deceive This is like saying a photocopier won't attempt to deceive. Neither has the intelligence required to deceive, but both can produce deceptive output, and do.
26.
by chrisjj 4d ago
> You're not helping your case the way you think you are. Best not tell them, because they're helping everyone who might otherwise believe their nonsense.
27.
by chrisjj 4d ago
> if we transcribe your brain into a simulation and give it a tickrate, you will be just autocomplete too. That's a really bad transcription, then. Brains do much more than output language.
28.
by chrisjj 4d ago
> When we reported this behavior to Reddit, the rep who helped us set up the campaign just vanished. He was probably busy clicking ads...
29.
by chrisjj 4d ago
> the campaign’s goal is now “won a puzzle” instead of “opened the app”. So, a CAPTCHA!
30.
by chrisjj 5d ago
Thanks. I think I misinterpreted inviting .

More ›