chrisfowles

5 ms·

1.
by chrisfowles 2y ago
Or even worse, Frankston.
2.
by chrisfowles 2y ago
From my perspective, you might be using take-home challenges incorrectly. The purpose for us is to have something that both sides are now somewhat familiar with, on which to base a technical conversation and ask questions. The actual soluti
3.
by chrisfowles 2y ago
Sandbox constraints. Windowing. Browser compatibility issues. Plugins and Integration compatibility.
4.
by chrisfowles 2y ago
So you're of the opinion that people who engage in voluntary activities for personal pleasure that put a higher burden on the health system, that those who are more wise about their choices have to use, should not have to pay thier way
5.
by chrisfowles 2y ago
Just need to put it in a big bag of rice.
6.
by chrisfowles 3y ago
I might agree with buying, it's pretty damaging with selling though.
7.
by chrisfowles 3y ago
Because it's unique to the use case, complex, and nuanced. It has to be exactly correct, and it has potentially serious ramifications if the answers are incorrect, potentially with legal ramifications that I'm keenly waiting to se
8.
by chrisfowles 3y ago
He's parked in the wrong bay for that charger
9.
by chrisfowles 3y ago
Why on earth is your state in git? The tool has built-in functionality to handle just these kinds of workflows. This reads a lot like hitting your thumb with the hammer and blaming hammers.
10.
by chrisfowles 3y ago
One of the reasons that English has been so successful as a global business language is its ability to be flexible and splodgable and still make sense.
11.
by chrisfowles 3y ago
Anything that avoids ambiguity here is beneficial. Even if the comment itself is perfectly crafted, the potential for misunderstanding remains. This method outlines the expectations for responses much more than it conveys the tone of the me