Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
chrisdotcode
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
Nintendo 64 Joystick Pinout for Arduino
(dpedu.io)
34 points
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
|
6 comments
62.
▲
Sqlite, Google and Phone Calls
(twitter.com)
1 points
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
|
0 comments
63.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
People who are interested in Modular phones can also check out Phoneblok's website[0], which I believe to be the people who started Project Ara. [0] https://phonebloks.com/
64.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
Can you give us more details about your setup, and how you set it up?
65.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
There's a common saying that, "Everything about Go is great - except the language". I guess a book written by Kernighan himself shows how wonderful the ecosystem is.
66.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
This needs to be the top comment. Can you imagine a person who claims their fight-or-flight response gets triggered by sexual jokes (jokes that were actually more homosexual in content than degrading towards women), but then actually has n
67.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
You can find the previous discussion about this (from last month) here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8983158
68.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
I'm not a religious patio11 reader (as of yet), so I haven't come across much of it. Good to know he's written more about it.
69.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
As stated, I wanted to see which features were generic to enterprise in general. Thank you!
70.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
Thank you, this helps enormously. It's this sort of stuff I'm talking about: I've never even heard of an SLA or a support coverage contract (and apparently there are tiers of support?); things that enterprise users want and e
71.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
I'm going to be selling a B2B SaaS. Rather than be hyper-specific, I'm wondering if there's a list of highest conversion and most wanted enterprise features to sell? If support is common amongst enterprise tiers, I'm sur
72.
▲
Ask HN: How to determine legitmate enterprise features?
9 points
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
|
14 comments
73.
▲
This connection is untrusted
(whitehouse.gov)
6 points
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
|
3 comments
74.
▲
U.S. Marshals to auction off 50,000 Bitcoins forfeited by Silk Road founder
(twitter.com)
1 points
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
|
0 comments
75.
▲
The People’s PRISM
(medium.com)
1 points
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
|
0 comments
76.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
http://www.yesodweb.com/book/shakespearean-templates#shakesp... If you're used to only programming in dynamic languages, it can be a shock, but yes, a good type system can do things you never thought possible. If
77.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
This new, awesome site is using the framework Yesod[0], which is kinda like the Rails of the Haskell world, only it can do rad stuff like prevent XSS and 404s at compile time . Yes, you read that right. [0] http://www.yesodweb.c
78.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
EDIT: To the author, the download and email icons are the same. This is fantastic. A feature you might not have realized is that it works well with NoScript users. With font-faces considered harmful[0], these icons can be delivered to the u
79.
▲
Git 2.3 has been released
(github.com)
2 points
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
|
0 comments
80.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
Word. Blacklist-all-by-default should be the strategy, not haphazard whitelist. Very similar to how you're asked if you want to share your location/microphone/etc with a website - JavaScript should likewise be compartmentaliz
81.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
(This is a reply to a nested comment, but I felt it was important enough to be top-level): > and pretending that a site is "broken" if it doesn't work for a handful of geeks is being willfully obtuse. This is the common ra
82.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
> The cost to support users such as you is just not worth it, you're too small of a segment. You don't understand. The web is content -based. Like motherfuckingwebsite.com [0] shows, you don't need dynamic content to pres
83.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
The oft-touted claim is that client-side templating is easier, but they're the same, really. The server solution is literally using the same exact templating engine and code. What people are conflating is "doing things in the clie
84.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
But that's the thing. It's far easier to 'program' a static HTML than any other dynamic alternative. What people seem to not understand is that the exact same template that they are using on the client renders exactly
85.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
I'm not bashing the article - I'm referring to the mindset necessary for the fact that this article even needed to be created. Server-side rendering should have always been first-class.
86.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
I agree. This is the progressive enhancement I've talked about earlier. Present a long, full form for JS-less users, and present it all nice-ified for those with, and send it off for server processing when you're done.
87.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
> Progressive enhancement (beyond very small apps) is a challenge to maintain, since UI state needs to be shared between a server runtime and client runtime. It does? Why? The server is handling the data to be rendered either way, and as
88.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
As I've said, > The solution is very simple: render all the data on the server, and progressively enhance subsets of your app with JS, by overriding the defaults of the rendered page. It's literally like we're discovering
89.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
There's an option for the basic HTML layout available if you have JS disabled. That's the second-best approach. The first is using a JS-redirect to the flashy AJAX page, or just overriding all the default handlers necessary with J
90.
▲
by
chrisdotcode
12y ago
EDIT: Lots of downvotes for saying that there are other ways to program apps besides doing everything on the client. Render content on the server, enhance content presentation on the client. --- I don't get it. Is this 1996? Why ar
More ›