chottocharaii

5 ms·

1.
by chottocharaii 2y ago
I don't understand this perspective. Why should I resent the creation of value from behaviours that I would be doing anyway.
2.
by chottocharaii 2y ago
This isn't going to work so long as WikiData is controlled by admins that misapply the notability criteria to delete information they subjectively consider trivial I think the next frontier is a a wiki-style, collaborative site, delibe
3.
by chottocharaii 2y ago
Two problems: - Incentivising decentralised infrastructure (this solves that) - Incentivising content creation (completely different issue, will always require a political solution, and cannot be solved by technologists)
4.
by chottocharaii 2y ago
These kinds of comments are legally ignorant. I’m always taken aback by these kinds of “but actually” comments on HN that ‘correct’ another user without any regard to how the law would be applied.
5.
by chottocharaii 2y ago
I think it’s a reasonable explanation to a reasonable moral decision. Good for Harvard
6.
by chottocharaii 2y ago
"My map represents the first attempt to map Australian laws, cases and regulations across the Commonwealth, States and Territories semantically, that is, by their underlying meaning." I think Jade.io has had a go at this, IIRC. Th
7.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
This is such a boring, semantic argument NVIDIA’s products can colloquially be described as commodities in some contexts, as GPUs from NVIDIA can be interchangeable with GPUs from other manufacturers like AMD. For specific tasks like gaming
8.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
Okay so if that’s the case the developers/owners will work out the most economic model; whether it’s best to satisfy demand with bays or without bays This is self-correcting. Minimums only ensure an inappropriate amount of parking will
9.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
Well said !!
10.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
The analogy is apt
11.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
think there’s a misunderstanding. in my jurisdiction we use the word offence to refer to criminal actions. If the penalty is only civil, then this bolsters the case for being bold toward omens treatment of orphan works
12.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
We need orphan work legislation to clarify the law in this area
13.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
Riskier legal plays have been made
14.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
In ‘orphan work’ situations as long as a person had made a good faith effort to locate the copyright owner, and therefore isn’t infringing someone’s copyright wilfully; criminal liability won’t apply. The worst you’ll realistically face is
15.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
I’d expect that if the maker undertook a thorough and well-documented search for the rights holder; then just made it anyway, they’d legally be covered 1) It might be hard for the rights holder to assert their copyright at a later stage, if
16.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
OTOH slavery is so morally abhorrent that it far outweighs any positive contributions a person might make in their lifetime. I think its good that society condemns it in the strongest possible manner, including by renaming
17.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
Or, just let people and computers be inspired Ideas have never been the scope of copyright and it wasn’t in its democratic mandate. If creatives want that change, fine, advocate for a change of the law
18.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
why take it literally
19.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
What you’re describing requires an ability to copyright style on top of expression. That would be an unacceptable constraint on freedom of speech and artistic freedom in my view The ability of an industry to turn a profit should not constra
20.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
Why not just leave your account inactive?
21.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
Oh you. You nailed it. That's the core difference. /s
22.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
Its more efficient for them to satisfice through obtaining graduates with good signalling factors (good schools) than sort the wheat from the chaff themselves Ensuring opportunities for working class and marginalised people is an issue that
23.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
This just in: businesses employ people
24.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
Yes it'd be a derivative work owned by Paolini. Paolini would have copyright to the derivative work, to the extent that he has rights over derivative material. However, the prompter would have nothing
25.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
ITT: HN attempt an amateur discussion of legal theory, without referencing decades of scholarship on the topic
26.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
Splatoon ... Arms ... Nintendo Labo ...
27.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
They will. They'll lease to someone not on welfare.
28.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
(laughs in Australian)
29.
by chottocharaii 3y ago
a few things: 1) it can be used by defense attorneys if they want to discredit an officer during a trial 2) it can be used for victim’s or abuse to obtain context and realise they’re not alone 3) public naming and shaming disincentivises ba
30.
by chottocharaii 4y ago
'Hindsight is 20/20' is an odd way to respond to a regular financial occurrence since the ledger was invented. This stuff is in no sense outside the realm of a responsible CFO's imagination

More ›