chmike

5 ms·

1.
by chmike 25d ago
> I don't get it Is it hard to understand that for some people it may be difficult to read ? It might be due to motivation issues, thrust issues, or concentration issues. While at the same time they may have a rich inner imagination
2.
High-Temperature Superconductivity of Pure Mg Metals, UFOs and Cuprates
1 points by chmike 6mo ago|0 comments
3.
by chmike 2y ago
How does mox compare to maddy, another Go all in one mail server ? Does mox support antivirus addition ? Didn't see that in the docs but I may have skipped that section.
4.
by chmike 2y ago
humor: I wonder if the upvotes are cheerings that he finally stepped down or a respectful salute. I give my respectful salute. Go is awesome and I hope it will continue to progress in that direction. Thank you Russ Cox
5.
by chmike 2y ago
While I agree that we're not there yet, I'm one of the people who assumes that it is feasible to beat humans intellectually.
6.
by chmike 2y ago
The problem is not being unpaid. The problem is lack of verification and control, which itself result from lack of help and participation. You won't fix these problems by throwing money at it.
7.
by chmike 3y ago
And human generated data may not ?
8.
by chmike 3y ago
What I don't understand is why computers and operating systems have not adopted the TAI as time reference which is monotonic, etc. Time is a complete mess.
9.
by chmike 3y ago
I would have tried parallelism just by curiosity. Split and spread the computation over multiple cores. If you have n cores you could get close to a factor n increase minus the cost of spreading the data and combining the results. That&#x27
10.
by chmike 3y ago
It depends on the distribution of probabilities of being used. If least recently used data has the same probability to be requested than the others, then random picking will do as well as LRU. When the least recently used data does have a l
11.
by chmike 3y ago
The peer review system is definitely biased. It's ok for many articles, but there are outliers. For instance really original theories or experimental data. The publication may be stopped to avoid putting the journal's reputation a
12.
by chmike 3y ago
The effectiveness really depends on the request pattern. In some use case, the LRU is the most efficient. When it is purely random, it obviously won't be the best as any value has the same probability to be selected. Regarding simplici
13.
by chmike 3y ago
A close up section of the same zone in the images would make them visible. I could hardly see the artefacts in the first place as my attention was caught with the highly contrasted parts of the images.
14.
by chmike 3y ago
I suggested the certificate solution but it's far from being lightweight. I found a simpler solution that may fit some use cases. The client sends a request, the server returns a response that may be big that also contains a random va
15.
by chmike 3y ago
A three way handshake would be simpler and wouldn't waste cpu and energy.
16.
by chmike 3y ago
Thank you. It's the best argument against the certificate suggestion I have read so far. It's a problem I overlooked. Edit: If the server creates the certificate with a three way handshake, it will use the remote IP address. So th
17.
by chmike 3y ago
I didn't mean to generalize the use of certificate. It would be for a specific protocol for a specific application. I just wanted to justify that we are not required to use three way handshake. Revocation is indeed a weak point of this
18.
by chmike 3y ago
In prior configuration, the UDP client must get a certificate which uses three way handshake to verify the IP address. Once a client has it's certificate, it can perform transactions with a simple two way transactions.
19.
by chmike 3y ago
The problem result from the ability to forge a fake origin IP address. This can be avoided by adding a certificate for the IP address. It adds a processing and size overhead, but it also preserves the single round trip transaction.
20.
Introduction to the Conjugate Gradient Method Without Agonizing Pain (1994) [pdf](cs.cmu.edu)
71 points by chmike 3y ago|15 comments
21.
Explanation of Cold Nuclear Fusion and Biotransmutations
2 points by chmike 3y ago|0 comments
22.
by chmike 3y ago
Thank you very much. Here is my email address: mail@chmike.com I have just set it up. It should work
23.
by chmike 3y ago
I'ld love to login lobste.rs but we need an invite to join. How can we join if we don't know anybody ? This leaves good people out.
24.
by chmike 3y ago
That voting system seams overly complex, but an idea worth to be explored and tested.
25.
by chmike 3y ago
There is a french company named mailinblack [1] that does this. They protect administrations in this way. [1] https://www.mailinblack.com/
26.
by chmike 3y ago
Note: My comment is about communication restrictions and not about Imran Khan or Pakistan. Restricting communication does indeed introduce a bias in information that people may get and thus the opinion they may forge. As such, freedom of co
27.
by chmike 4y ago
I'm obviously talking about ebooks downloaded from commercial platforms like KDP Amazon, and distributed for free on Z-library without permission from the author. Comparing this to your comment is whataboutism. Comments on hacker news
28.
by chmike 4y ago
You steal the author's investment in time and effort to write the book and conceive it's content. How you steal (making a copy) doesn't affect the fact that you prevent the author to get his share or reward from it.
29.
by chmike 4y ago
That is pure whataboutism. What has this to do with stealing books ?
30.
by chmike 4y ago
Z-library is used for steeling author's work. Does IPFS want to support it ? z-library is not equivalent to sci-hub.

More ›