Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
chme
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
chme
12d ago
I just find it very interesting that someone equates secrecy with privacy. In my opinion, and in the current law there is a distinction. If private data got leaked, like revenge porn, it is a breach and that private data that belongs to an
2.
▲
by
chme
12d ago
So you say it is okay when someone you trust, uses that trust to upload your personal files from your air-gapped system to the internet, for everyone to freely share it, because now the data is "public"? To me private file stay pr
3.
▲
by
chme
12d ago
The last point is pretty clear, and the text below clarifies it: > To protect the privacy of the individual and to strengthen the freedom of the information which concern the public the yet last point was added. The privacy of individual
4.
▲
by
chme
13d ago
That sounds dystopian to me and is against the hacker ethics.
5.
▲
by
chme
13d ago
Well... If someone leaks private data on individuals online, those should be deleted.
6.
▲
by
chme
14d ago
I'd prefer to stay within the [hacker ethics]( https://www.ccc.de/en/hackerethics ), and protect private data. For non-private/personal data, sure. But individual people need their privacy protected.
7.
▲
by
chme
20d ago
That isn't confusing at all, if you know how maintained stable releases work. Happens with the Linux kernel as well.
8.
▲
by
chme
1mo ago
> If what you're saying is true and accurate, then US-based AI labs are in big trouble. Well... I would think that the whole AI industry in the US are working towards public bailouts... Which I guess they'll get under the curre
9.
▲
DroidCap: OS Support for Capability-Based Permissions in Android (2019)
(publications.cispa.de)
2 points
by
chme
2mo ago
|
0 comments
10.
▲
by
chme
3mo ago
I assumed that they meant that they will not enforce it via technical means.
11.
▲
by
chme
4mo ago
#define EPROCRASTINATE 245 /* exhausted all output tokens with reasoning */
12.
▲
by
chme
6mo ago
I'm just wondering why this isn't a European Citizen Initiative (ECI)... I could not find any information on what kind of influence a online-petition on wemove.eu would have...
13.
▲
by
chme
7mo ago
Threema is still vendor lock-in.
14.
▲
by
chme
7mo ago
Element X is in some cases still a downgrade from Element. For instance there doesn't seem to be a way to create local key backups anymore. Also, that calls between Element and Element X are incompatible means both apps need to be inst
15.
▲
by
chme
7mo ago
I had to deal with Intel Quark SoC X1000 on a Galileo board years ago, where the LOCK prefix instruction caused segfaults. Since the SoC is single threaded, the lock prefix could just be patched out from resulting binaries, before the compi
16.
▲
by
chme
8mo ago
> The problem being discussed is that the user of the script needs to validate it. It's great if it's validated by the author, but that's already the situation we're in. The user is free to use a LLM to 'validate
17.
▲
by
chme
8mo ago
Well... Maybe just have a BIOS on your system that fetches a markdown, pushes it to a LLM to generate a new and exciting operating system for you on every boot. Wouldn't that be nice?
18.
▲
by
chme
8mo ago
TBH, I doubt that this will happen... It is much easier to use LLMs to generate code, validate that code as a developer, fix it, if necessary, and check it into the repo, then if every user has to send prompts to LLMs in order to get the co
19.
▲
by
chme
8mo ago
Maybe that is a reason for this approach. It changes the responsibility of errors from the person writing that code, to the one executing it. Pretty brilliant in a way.
20.
▲
by
chme
8mo ago
Even bringing down the "theory" to paper in prosa will be lossy. And natural languages are open to interpretation and a lot of context will remain unmentioned. While programming languages, together with their tested environment, c
21.
▲
by
chme
8mo ago
So... What you are saying is that we don't need 'install.md'. Because a developer can just use a LLM to generate a 'install.sh', validate that, and put it into the repo? Good idea. That seems sensible. Bonus: LLM is
22.
▲
by
chme
8mo ago
TBH. I never read prose that couldn't be in some way misinterpreted or misunderstood. Because much of it is context sensitive. That is why we have programming languages, they, coupled with a specific interpreter/compiler, are pret
23.
▲
by
chme
1y ago
It really depends on the order of priorities. If the overall goal is to allow digital archeologist to make sense of some file they found, it would be prudent to give them some instructions on how it is decoded. I just hope that people will
24.
▲
by
chme
1y ago
nix possible with lix, if you can stomach nix syntax.
25.
▲
by
chme
1y ago
> The spec is being implemented by Apple, who is sensitive to privacy issues. I generally agree with your points, but I wouldn't trust Apple, or any publicly traded company, to have any kind of ethics. Just because their incentive t
26.
▲
by
chme
1y ago
Not a firefox dev, but pretty sure its 'main' The "new" git default branch name is 'main' and 'autoland' existed before next to 'mozilla-central' and is the one where commits usually appear
27.
▲
by
chme
1y ago
Not only that, but the software also contained login information to the AWS backend archive servers: https://www.techspot.com/news/107792-hacker-breaches-telemes...
28.
▲
by
chme
1y ago
This is also not surprising for BGS as was demonstrated with the multiple Skyrim re-releases, which didn't fix all issues patched by the unofficial patches, and even introduced more. See the change log here: https://www.afkm
29.
▲
by
chme
1y ago
I was using Truecharts before k8s was deprecated. The deprecation caused me to move to something more neutral and stay away from all 'native' apps of TrueNAS and migrated to ordinary docker-compose, because that seem to be the mos
30.
▲
by
chme
1y ago
But AFAIK, updates will overwrite everything, so installing anything is just temporary.
More ›