ching_wow_ka

10 ms·

1.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
Is this often done? Can you provide a reference explaining this further? Possibly specific to ML models.
2.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
That's interesting. Any source? I live in the northeastern part of the United States and it's rare for me to see a speed limit above 65 mph.
3.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
I couldn't figure out how to get "1." to work.
4.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
I couldn't understand how it works. Are they supposed to be merged on one page or on two separate pages?
5.
Benefits of Reading Actual Books vs. On an E-reader(mic.com)
1 points by ching_wow_ka 11y ago|1 comments
6.
Deep Learning Summer School, Montreal 2015 Videos(videolectures.net)
1 points by ching_wow_ka 11y ago|0 comments
7.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
If you're trying to learn about deep learning, I highly suggest using Python(Theano) or Lua(Torch). They're free and used by the experts in the field for research. Even if you don't want to use the frameworks, you'll sti
8.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
That's right; we can't know for sure and I'm sure you'll get some backlash for this comment. As with everything though, we need a balance. If we say that we can't know for sure and give up, then no advancements woul
9.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
How many words do you think the entire web, as crawled by Google, has?
10.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
I can say pretty certainly that all the text they've gathered through the Google Books project is in use in their language models and other AI models for their search engine, speech recognition, etc. They got what they wanted. I can&#x
11.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
I think you'll agree that there's a big jump from being able to access an API X times a day to having access to a data dump.
12.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
I've found reading the right books to be the best way. Lectures tend to be too broad for me, although they can serve as good overviews. My philosophy is that if I want to learn something, I get a few suggestions for books, briefly skim
13.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
If you're going to say something like that, you might as well explain why you think that way. They seem to fill the void between in-depth study and knowing absolutely nothing.
14.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
I skimmed through the article, but I couldn't find anything about how the chicken was fed.
15.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
It's there. "Mining of Massive Datasets"
16.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
Depends on what you want to learn.
17.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
If you're a beginner, you're probably going to be too overwhelmed by the options. I often find emailing/asking a few different professors/researchers/students in the field you want to learn for suggestions more prod
18.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
I am somewhat ignorant. What significant achievements does Dawkins hold in his field? All I know is that he's known for trying to convince others of his beliefs.
19.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
A quote from someone who commented on the page: "When the programming addicts on Hacker News write about programming addiction, they almost never call it programming addiction. Usually they call it being passionate about programming. A
20.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
I doubt that it's used in M. "Why not just build M with neural nets from the beginning? Without the right data, neural nets couldn’t provide a service much more powerful than, well, Siri, and Wit.ai’s tech can get things started w
21.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
So then it seems like the author of the code doesn't understand that "NN" means "Nearest Neighbors" and not "Neural Network"? He mentions that he used sklearn's Neural Network libraries in his blog po
22.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
I'm not much of a mathematician, but I found "Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty" by Morris Kline ( http://www.amazon.com/Mathematics-Loss-Certainty-Oxford-Pape... ) very insightful in regards to the developmen
23.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
I think rather than saying "The universe behaves according to laws of physics...", it would be more appropriate/correct to say that our "laws" of physics somewhat consistently describe our observations of the univer
24.
by ching_wow_ka 11y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g Can someone address this? I've seen this put forth by many and Dawkins sounds very, very confused and completely avoids the question.