chii

7 ms·

1.
by chii 3d ago
> lobbying against those laws. the original question was that the LLM creates extinction level event for mankind in order to lower emissions. I'm sure that no matter how the LLMs lobby, they cannot successfully lobby for a law (whic
2.
by chii 3d ago
> one should be held to a different standard than the other. harassing a worker is not the way to fix the problem. The worker has no agency to affect the changes desired by the harasser. It's an issue with the gov't, and needs
3.
by chii 4d ago
Why can't the LLM's be told/prompted to follow all relevant laws while it optimizes for a result?
4.
by chii 4d ago
> Monetarily, Nvidia is creating a lot of money in our economy. nvidia's money either comes from equity, or from debt. This means this money is "created" not from nothing, but from future commitments (ala, debt repayments,
5.
by chii 5d ago
> They're still autocomplete it's like saying our brain is just some chemical chain reactions. True, but also irrelevant.
6.
by chii 5d ago
> If a self improving model can't produce enough value to pay the electric bill then who cares? Unplug it. so you would unplug a child who hasn't shown their potential yet, simply because they don't produce enough value at
7.
by chii 6d ago
> without providing attribution or compensation? many teachers also taught many students over the course of history, and very few would eventually pay any compensation or even attribute their financial (or career) outcomes to the teacher
8.
by chii 6d ago
and people misuse this quote to justify unreasonable behaviour that does not progress the world.
9.
by chii 6d ago
> the greatest scientific minds if one has a scientific mind, they will accept evidence which may be contrary to their personal views. If you dont, you cannot be said to have a scientific mind, let alone greatest. > founding fathers o
10.
by chii 7d ago
I dont know any clinical information, but some (many, in fact) people assume mental illness when someone behaves in such a way that they believe their world view and mental model is absolute and fight to the last tooth and nail against any
11.
by chii 7d ago
> do no harm to humans? but you haven't specified _exactly_ what harm to humans mean. Would you consider the AI overlord to have harmed humans if they kept humans like we keep zoos today?
12.
by chii 8d ago
> copyright ownership is not a monopoly because there are other copyrighted works they are not fungible, unlike houses. Also, if you could copy a house like you could copy digital goods (i would download a car), i am also going to claim
13.
by chii 8d ago
> until the end of the author's life. which is too long, and also too short - what about authors who wrote finished their book on their deathbed? Then their rights are shorter than someone young - an unfair discrimination. That&#x27
14.
by chii 8d ago
> It you think copyright should be shorter to everyone, then inheriting something valuable shouldn't be a thing as well? inheritance has nothing to do with copyright. Financial assets are not monopolies. Copyright is only a valuable
15.
by chii 8d ago
forensic accounting and audits also require a paper trail. So if you have no logging and such, you will have already failed regulatory reporting standards - just like you would fail an accounting audit if you have no paper trail of where yo
16.
by chii 8d ago
> would have to be honestly reported for that idea to work. and why does this idea work for accounting audits, but not for security? As long as regulations for companies exist, they would necessarily follow it, and this would lead to rep
17.
by chii 9d ago
> pay their fortinet renewal and check "Security: Done!" without any kind of analysis. there exists objective measure of security, which would be some sort of hacks/breaches per period. If customers cared about it (and i a
18.
by chii 11d ago
> The world would be quite miserable if "perfectly legal" would be what everyone optimizes for. what you will find is that this is what corporations optimizes for. Therefore, you as a person, cannot compete with the corp. That&
19.
by chii 13d ago
> ICE is becoming a paramilitary force this is how the gestapo gets established.
20.
by chii 14d ago
> Google has probably the most and best code base among all tech companies but its Gemini is bad at coding. probably because google knows people would want to extract google's proprietary code from gemini if they use their own code
21.
by chii 15d ago
> In many cases people don’t switch to something else because there isn’t an alternative. no, they have an alternative - abstinence. And yet, large majority overwhelmingly chooses not to abstain. Therefore, it does not matter what they s
22.
by chii 16d ago
With each hellfire costing upwards of $150k per shot, it's not cost effective to use them to shoot down jammers
23.
by chii 19d ago
completely expected, but still quite sad. But like hydra, cut off one head, and two shall spawn. It should never be illegal to proxy another site, if the information content from that site was originally user generated. Using copyright as a
24.
by chii 20d ago
> start generating profit, and then you can start optimizing your costs. this assumes you can generate profit before you can get optimized - what if profit generation is only possible with optimized software? A lot of online MMO-style ga
25.
by chii 20d ago
the price swings are part of the market's reaction to real life situations. The opposite of a market solving a resource allocation problem is the command economy, where some (small) group people are tasked with decisions like how much
26.
by chii 21d ago
News and recency bias tend to cause people to make wrong (or non-optimal) choices. And in any case, a preventative measure, like thoroughly washing the lettuce is a good form of insurance for home made foods, regardless of what's repor
27.
by chii 21d ago
but it's a really shallow form of discussion, as most tweets are the equivalent of short-form videos of tiktoks.
28.
by chii 21d ago
collective intelligence is not a superhuman intelligence. Markets solves the resource allocation problem, but it doesn't and realistically cannot be called intelligent (even tho it's been called wisdom of the crowds), in the same
29.
by chii 21d ago
> as a force to have open weight models run better on Nvidia against the rest. this is the crux - if nvidia makes it so that open weights end up running better on nvidia hardware than competitor's, then it's going to prevent ha
30.
by chii 22d ago
it's a crude approximation to economies of scale. However, big doesn't always mean economies of scale because efficiency tends to drop when growing big, unless the head works hard to ensure it isnt bloating. Unfortunately, sometim

More ›