chickopozo

7 ms·

1.
by chickopozo 13y ago
People use a GUI for git?
2.
by chickopozo 13y ago
/facepalm Whilst the article is written like a movie plot you on the other hand are looking for things that are not there mate.
3.
by chickopozo 13y ago
http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/d?k=01eHy-6e8CKpz-d... k is your id and c is the ciphertext the key is stored on their server.
4.
by chickopozo 13y ago
This has existed for years: http://www.google.com/recaptcha/mailhide/ And your email isn't stored but rather encrypted and the ciphertext passed via the url.
5.
by chickopozo 13y ago
I think the software was called canoscan.
6.
by chickopozo 13y ago
I bought a Canon scanner in 1996. It had a one click email button on it. I hooked my computer to the net so... does this mean I should really hold the patent?
7.
by chickopozo 13y ago
How is this news? Its been done so many times I've lost count.
8.
by chickopozo 13y ago
They used a hacky method from the old IE Toolbar. That's like me scraping a website and blaming them when they change it.
9.
by chickopozo 13y ago
TL;DR Author is wrong about clickjacking and sandboxing is a good thing.
10.
by chickopozo 13y ago
I commented on the page why the author should not give security advice. You should use a different domain as there are tricks to leverage arbitrary js on a subdomain. Sandboxing is to help protect the client from arbitrary crap. It was neve
11.
by chickopozo 13y ago
Great another unproven tool tech "journalists" will be dangerously touting as secure. See: cryptocat.
12.
by chickopozo 13y ago
He's saying it should not be considered secure until proven.
13.
by chickopozo 13y ago
Dear Digg, If you use the work social whilst creating a RSS reader you have already failed. Sincerely, People who actually used Google Reader P.S. A point-and-click html scraper to rss would be nice too.
14.
by chickopozo 13y ago
But if you read up I have explained, fast is better in hash functions.
15.
by chickopozo 13y ago
Encryption does not provide Integrity (hash) or authentication (mac) crypt(1) should be an example of how not to do hashing.
16.
by chickopozo 13y ago
>Outside of this, no one should be using MD5 in this day and age, I would even recommend against Sha256 and other variants in that family, though I have a lot of respect for Blowfish, etc. @shanelija SHA-256 is a secure cryptographicall
17.
by chickopozo 13y ago
Blog: https://www.cloudcracker.com/blog/
18.
by chickopozo 13y ago
I want my time back, three pages on basically nothing. I broke into my house last year because I lost my keys -> brb writing an article titled "How I became a burglar and locksmith"* *I took my keys from in the house so... by ars standa
19.
by chickopozo 13y ago
The same hardware, in the same location, running the same software, same power source, next to each other. It's quite likely actually. Do you do your backups to an identical* computer right next to your main one? (* factor in wear)