chickenimprint

8 ms·

1.
by chickenimprint 2mo ago
very true. I just bought [product placeholder] and it has [features placeholder]. I am no longer distract by phon.
2.
by chickenimprint 2mo ago
You allude to another reason people stop using them, besides battery degradation and loss, what is it?
3.
by chickenimprint 2mo ago
We've had devices like this forever. A: add a gasket. B: glueseal everything except for the battery, connected via exposed gold pads.
4.
by chickenimprint 4mo ago
LLMs are to a large degree trained on pirated books.
5.
by chickenimprint 4mo ago
Even the premise is ridiculous, inlay hints for parameter names have existed for a really long time. What human using a code editor could come up with this "problem"? The comments all seem to be nodding along and even suggesting a
6.
by chickenimprint 4mo ago
I wonder whether a person prompted this slop and is somehow unaware of the existence of LSPs, or if it's entirely automated and the planning subagent hallucinated this being an issue for humans.
7.
by chickenimprint 7mo ago
> Software is everywhere and thus the value of maintaining software and the value of software engineering remains high. This is an unfinished argument. What if we get coding agents to maintain software? What if frequent rewriting becomes
8.
by chickenimprint 7mo ago
> What I think is much more likely to happen is the number of software engineers greatly reduces, but the remaining ones actually get paid more. You realize that this is contradictory, right? If the number of competitors remains the same
9.
by chickenimprint 7mo ago
You can't get paid doing them. If coding goes away, decades of experience become worthless instantly. Not all of it, but the vast majority, enough to justify starting over in another career. In that world, it will have become more cost
10.
by chickenimprint 7mo ago
As far as I know, you can't disable the python interpreter. It's part of the reasoning mode. If you ask ChatGPT, it will confirm that it uses the python interpreter to do arithmetic on large numbers. To you, that should be convinc
11.
by chickenimprint 7mo ago
I chose Mistral because it's a large SOTA model that allows me to disable tool calling. If you try using ChatGPT, you'll see it goes into reasoning mode (It flashes the text "Working") and takes a while when asked to do
12.
by chickenimprint 7mo ago
Ask a local AI or a chatbot that allows you to disable tool calling to multiply two large number for example. This is what Mistral outputs: The result of multiplying 63,157,997,633 by 63,114,90,009 is: 3,965,689,999,999,999,999,999 (approxi
13.
by chickenimprint 7mo ago
It's a well known fact that LLMs struggle with basic arithmetic of large numbers, that's not what they are made for. Most chatbots will just call a python interpreter in the background.
14.
by chickenimprint 7mo ago
This policy has existed for (non-3D) printers and image editing programs for decades now. They will refuse to print currency or anything with a specific watermark.
15.
by chickenimprint 7mo ago
Their business is making money. If they can build money printing machines, they're not going to refuse to use them because that's "not their business". Do you really think they would be out donating trillions of dollars
16.
by chickenimprint 7mo ago
Messages to clients are presumably handled by the agency, not the performer.
17.
by chickenimprint 7mo ago
I wouldn't consider him an AI-researcher.
18.
by chickenimprint 7mo ago
Swahili is subcontinental lingua franca spoken by 200M people and growing quickly. Polish is spoken by a shrinking population in one country where English is understood anyways.
19.
by chickenimprint 8mo ago
So it's a large version of those rechargeable hand-warmers?
20.
by chickenimprint 8mo ago
Integrated circuits don't "start with C". What does that even mean? C is just an interchangeable language the compiler frontend parses. A microprocessor starts by executing the machine code at the reset vector. This machine c
21.
by chickenimprint 8mo ago
I'm not sure what this has to do with positivism. Data is evidence for all models that predict the data. It doesn't matter that almost all of those models are extremely wrong, while the most accurate models are gross approximation
22.
by chickenimprint 8mo ago
IC?
23.
by chickenimprint 8mo ago
Information about an author can be evidence in support of or against the credibility of their claims.
24.
by chickenimprint 8mo ago
You're mistaken. It says something about the shape of humans. Bicycles, which are powered by the human body, show the inferiority of bipedalism to wheels, when it comes to fast and efficient locomotion.
25.
by chickenimprint 8mo ago
Falsifying the logical inverse of X is identical to verifying X. There's nothing about negation that does anything here. You're making the same mistake people make when claiming "You can't prove a negative". > Th
26.
by chickenimprint 8mo ago
Then people will simply falsify the logical inverse of their current hypotheses. Preregistration is a more promising approach.
27.
by chickenimprint 8mo ago
The human form is terrible for most productive things. We are slow, weak, short, and inaccurate. Robotic arms are the true multitalents of manipulating the physical world.
28.
by chickenimprint 8mo ago
Because the US is the only country that defected from the Paris agreement. The US is the only country led by climate change deniers. Tons of countries are led by malevolent and selfish leaders, but none are as incompetent and unpredictable
29.
by chickenimprint 8mo ago
Ocean freight accounts for 2-3% of global emissions. It is orders of magnitude more efficient and clean than air or road freight per ton-kilometer. It's twice as efficient as rail. The ability to efficiently transport goods enables you
30.
by chickenimprint 8mo ago
No, there's really just a few select politicians standing in the way. Governments around the world have implemented tons of policies to attempt to address the crisis, but unless every country participates, it's economically suicid

More ›