cheikhcheikh

30 ms·

1.
by cheikhcheikh 12d ago
I think that would be more of ASI than AGI, AGI is a smart human, I'd say we're pretty close if not already there for most stuff we've been focusing on like coding. ASI is a super genius, beyond the smartest human, and we&#x2
2.
by cheikhcheikh 13d ago
But is it byte for byte identical ?
3.
by cheikhcheikh 13d ago
Your experience sounds really interesting, can you tell us more ?
4.
by cheikhcheikh 14d ago
I mean sure, you can add a third, and a fourth and a fifth one if ur ok with the added cost, latency and it actually helps. Redundancy is a core concept in software and CS and at the heart of making many systems, complex or otherwise, relia
5.
by cheikhcheikh 25d ago
What you want can be accomplished with an extra doc, call it the Log, where the llm appends things tried, lessons learned, failed experiments etc.. while leaving the comments as terse accurate snapshot of the current state. I've been
6.
by cheikhcheikh 26d ago
from my experience they're actually much lower than people think, especially when using Postgres for things it's not well-suited for like queuing, and the problem is you rarely can just throw more hardware at it to solve the probl
7.
by cheikhcheikh 26d ago
you really went digging with that 3 months old hn comment. What's wrong with that comment btw? Are you saying he was lying and they did in fact commit to the rewrite at that point?
8.
by cheikhcheikh 28d ago
It was communicated fine, can you be more specific ?
9.
by cheikhcheikh 28d ago
it's not the way to go if you hit the limits very quickly and have to waste immense time migrating.
10.
by cheikhcheikh 1mo ago
Thw bottleneck become compiling and running the code every iteration so it wont be seconds
11.
by cheikhcheikh 1mo ago
This has not been my experience at all with gpt sol on ultra/max. Some concurrent code is just really really hard to write and even in those cases LLMs can help, the barrier for extensive thorough testing and writing your own custom si
12.
by cheikhcheikh 1mo ago
Do you think diffusion models or models that generate video and image are conscious? I'd say most people who think LLMs are conscious don't think the same way about non-chattng models ( unless you ask them then they might say &quo
13.
by cheikhcheikh 1mo ago
I think you both are missing the point. Hes sayin larry is inhuman, hes closer to an apex predator or a serial killer freak of nature than your ordinary human
14.
by cheikhcheikh 2mo ago
nah. I have no horse in this race in fact before this blog I had high regards for andrew and zig, less-so after this blog. You're accusing me of cherry picking, can you explain how these are cherry picked ? do you even know what cherry
15.
by cheikhcheikh 2mo ago
> Incredible the different takeaways people get from text content on the internet It is incredible isn't it. "Jarred was already writing slop well before he had access to LLMs" "The grapevine was large and healthy and
16.
by cheikhcheikh 2mo ago
We've read the andrew blog. It is a personal attack a very petty one, you're clearly a biased fan of his and of zig probably if you cannot see the obvious, but we're telling you as outsiders how poorly it reflects on andrew a
17.
by cheikhcheikh 2mo ago
He is good, yes. There are are a lot of really good programmers, his fanboyschere make him sound like super genius mr.robot its so tacky and cringe. What did he really accomplish
18.
by cheikhcheikh 2mo ago
Well thats why his prediction is interesting. Hes saying they wont be ok in a couple of years. Of course theyll be there, programming languages dont really die but theyll be a shell of what was once believed to be their potential, a superio
19.
by cheikhcheikh 2mo ago
Man these are some impressive mental gymnastics... yes its an insult, made very public. It, and the rest of the insults, are very disrespectful and reflects very poorly on andrew and paints him as petty and childish
20.
by cheikhcheikh 2mo ago
Did you actually read it ? "Stinky manager" "alreay writing slop before llm" and nore insults, cmon now...
21.
by cheikhcheikh 3mo ago
that is his point...
22.
by cheikhcheikh 3mo ago
Sure, technically you are correct, i cant prove that im not a schizophrenic hallucinating everything including 2+2=4 and including this discussion. But starting from a reasonable point of beliefs that we accept it is fair to say 2+2=4 will
23.
by cheikhcheikh 6mo ago
A tool that can automate all of thinking and all of cognitive problem solving. I'd say very different yes.
24.
by cheikhcheikh 6mo ago
I actually find your argument to be the lazy and reductive one, and im surprised how many folks just parrot it confidently. This is clearly not like any other tool, what it can do, and more importantly the range of what it can mimic and pre
25.
by cheikhcheikh 7mo ago
By definition it should obvious the million-user server is a popular feature since it has a million user.
26.
by cheikhcheikh 8mo ago
I mean yeah... You kind of have to learn this stuff (performance engineering) by yourself (a strong education background helps a lot of course). There are transferable parts of it and there are platform-specific parts where you need to be s
27.
by cheikhcheikh 9mo ago
how are you so sure the afterlife does not exist
28.
by cheikhcheikh 10mo ago
terrible analogy. It's more like a chess grandmaster telling you not to let Stockfish play for you. Which would be a very obvious thing to not do anyway, just like for a learning programmer.
29.
by cheikhcheikh 10mo ago
The ony disgusting part of this thread is The arrogance in your comments, and this last one seals it
30.
by cheikhcheikh 10mo ago
Can you share any evidence of this massive sympathy?

More ›