cheesecompiler

5 ms·

1.
by cheesecompiler 12d ago
This is supported by the craze around moltbook, and the eventual cooling around it as it became clear they're just regurgitating prose
2.
by cheesecompiler 12d ago
Respectfully, it seems like the weapon of choice for many a government.
3.
by cheesecompiler 1mo ago
Tech guy discovers conversations with humans.
4.
by cheesecompiler 3mo ago
did for me even on low non thinking effort
5.
by cheesecompiler 4mo ago
This suggests that developers are the primary user base affecting valuation, not the average user, doesn't it? I don't know anyone among mortals who uses Claude. The spike does correlate with the exodus from OpenAI earlier in the
6.
by cheesecompiler 4mo ago
I hear "Substrate" a LOT.
7.
by cheesecompiler 4mo ago
And to me it seems like you're justifying a lack of oversight and dangers of this technology for what purpose exactly? Why are you defending a corporation?
8.
by cheesecompiler 4mo ago
Does he though?
9.
by cheesecompiler 4mo ago
No because gentrification is a side effect of private property, not insufficient technology.
10.
by cheesecompiler 4mo ago
i'll never forget Nothing Real / Apple Shake
11.
by cheesecompiler 5mo ago
"join to see"??? gtfo
12.
by cheesecompiler 5mo ago
> the AI pessimism is hard to understand in this context This is a burden of proof inversion: historically new technology has not resulted in optimistic outcomes. Quality of life improvements were side effects of capital accruing. AI opt
13.
Asking Rents in Canada Decline for 18th Consecutive Month(rentals.ca)
4 points by cheesecompiler 5mo ago|0 comments
14.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
There seem to be multiple mechanisms compensating for imperfect, lossy memory. "Dreaming" is another band-aid on inability to reliably store memory without loss of precision. How lossy is this pruning process? It's one thing
15.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
> a yesman can say yes by saying no What a great way to summarize LLM behaviour in 2026
16.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
> It's why for example occupy wallstreet was such a laughable failure. This claim is enormous. I would instead argue that the movement lacked cohesiveness because it basically complained about too large a set of (correctly identifie
17.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
The parent comment reads as an LLM to me as well.
18.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
Rebuttal: we are yet to see this actually materialize beyond the theoretical fantasy. We have seen this with computers and internet already: the supposedly democratic technology consolidated in a few platform monopolies.
19.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
Housing prices are not binary: they have skyrocket in every major city and city-adjacent suburb. The middle class has consistently declined since the 70s.
20.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
Fungibility means anything can be framed as economic value. Prisoner labour is also unlocking economic value, as is child labour. Also who are these non-theoretical people who in this economy can afford to sit around but are suddenly econom
21.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
Inability to do something != needing to take advantage of the situation.
22.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
This trick is called a red herring fallacy.
23.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
Labour getting ever-granular in the age of micro-loans and RentAHuman. > "Dashers have a new way to earn on their own terms" The classic meaning inversion of precariousness and lack of benefits as a virtue.
24.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
Does the amount listed change the underlying point?
25.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
> You certainly made the case that the GPL was the only force Nope.
26.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
There is a significant majority of people in Canada who not only vocally decided to not go to US but discourage their friends from doing so too. People have judged me for driving through the states.
27.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
Inclined to think that why?
28.
by cheesecompiler 6mo ago
Since Linux is GPL this seems to support my point.
29.
by cheesecompiler 7mo ago
I’m not saying it’s the only force. But if it wasn’t instrumental what’s your take on the cause of proprietary software dominating until relatively recently?
30.
by cheesecompiler 7mo ago
Right, as if _this_ is straw that breaks the camel's back, and not the pile of hay the camel has been carrying for decades.

More ›