cheatsheet

7 ms·

1.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
You don't have to become a woman unless you want to become a woman. I don't have to work for idiots, and neither do you. I think any form of prejudice hinders your ability to think regardless. They can't see existence the sam
2.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
It is sexism, and it's unfortunate. I'm a woman, and I pretend to be a man online so my comments and understandings of computer science, code, programming, and mathematics are treated with the same respect, and given the same kind
3.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
> “It goes beyond image classification — the most popular task in computer vision — and tries to answer one of the most fundamental questions in computer vision: What is the right representation of visual scenes? Can someone knowledgeabl
4.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
Yes, I agree with you so much. I used to beg my parents to order me various forms of an encyclopaedia, I used to devour bookshelves. I remember reading every breakfast food box and piece of junkmail, just because it was something new. I rem
5.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
Also, people do use this stuff to think about their computer systems, so I'm a little confused at the author's point of instinct and intuition. Most engineers are trained in analysis of the infinite (calculus), which also includes
6.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
Epistomology, psychology, and information theory tend to reflect them in an almost mirror way. Then again, is it just me who sees the patterns in the words, or are the patterns actually there? I think it probably depends on how you mind con
7.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
Then read it like a 12 year old girl would read the statement.
8.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
1. When you are poor, school feels like you are trading pleasing an adult for the slim chance of getting out of poverty. It feels less like you are working in a real system with an honest chance and more like you are playing in someone&#x27
9.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
This is the most ironically stupid thing about hacker culture. It's just as 'follow the leader' as directly following the leader, and it makes the culture and the people in it definably predictable. Actually reasoning about s
10.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
I understand your perspective and in the rational, everyday setting I agree with you. Thank you for your considerate reply.
11.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
But how do I know that I want my mind to be the way X wants my mind to be, without shaping it like that and biasing my assessment afterwards? How do I know whether I wanted my mind to be this way? How did my mind get this way? I know it&#x2
12.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
It has been a paranoid hypothesis of mine that the best programmers wind up programming people instead.
13.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
I'm disgusted by your disgust. I wanted a PhD more than anything, but I didn't understand my disorder at the time, and I didn't have the care nor coping skills I needed to get through life on top of achieving what I wanted to
14.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
I think your path selecting algorithm can wind up in a state of deadlock, but it is very clever in a socially passive assertive way. There has to be a way of handling paths crossing simultaneously, non-aggressively, and this can not be reso
15.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
I've had severe social anxiety for the bulk of my life. I've gone through periods of replacing it with a fundamentally dissociative awareness. The best I can describe it is being fully submerged in the belief that life is a dream,
16.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
I don't think you can prove that neither is true, but I rarely agree with myself to begin with. I will not rely on the summary explanation, I can assure you of that.
17.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
Thing I'm building | IDE,code,ssh | Documentation / Debugging Email and messages will always interrupt me, whether I have one monitor or three. Honestly, the internet is boring. Facebook is boring, here is boring, reddit is boring
18.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
In some regards I can certainly see Jayne's theory as correct with regards to the arising of consciousness as a mechanical function between the self and the environment in which the self exists, which results in a symbolic translation
19.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
It's not intimidation, it's just determining which path you want to take. The people who constructed the ground of the popular frameworks had to start somewhere too.
20.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
Software development helps me understand 'kinds' of information, and that the applicability of mathematics is dependent on the kind. But mathematics is not a sense, and neither is a program. These are the best conceptual construct
21.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
> My own understanding of loneliness relied on a belief in solid, separate selves that he saw as hopelessly outmoded. In his worldview, everyone was perpetually slipping into each other, passing through ceaseless cycles of transformation
22.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
> I do think I would have been worse off without the social aspects of my university years What aspect of face to face interaction makes it worth seeking?
23.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
When enough people are aware of the meme, and the meme is ingrained in culture enough to have a statistically significant effect on perceived ability. Or when people decide it is meaningless, out of desire to control their expectations of t
24.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
> Computer generated art tends to lack this trait, and this, I think, is why it feels less valid than human-made art. I could not disagree with you more. Most of traditional contemporary art for the past 100 years have been art pieces a
25.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
Real innovation doesn't lead with absolute certainty, it does not know whether it will lead to a reward. I really don't understand the mentality here where everyone thinks they know what they are doing before they do it. I can und
26.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
I don't think specific problems are the issue. Even assembling furniture given instructions is not too difficult to ask a machine to solve, given the right programming language. It's the jump from one specific problem to another,
27.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
That's your definition of intelligence. You could solve problems quickly with a failure rate of 2%, but that 2% error actually kills off, deforms, or ostracizes 10% of your population, and that 10% contains 100% of what you need to sol
28.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
This is internet and hacker culture; Google just happens to have a disproportionate amount of people who fit into those categories there.
29.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
My apologies for the lack of clarity: I was following the thought path that was concerned with the validity of the four color theorem proof because of the Coq bug.
30.
by cheatsheet 11y ago
Yes, the four color theorem was proven by Appel and Haken on an IBM 370-168 at the University of Illinois in June 1976. Coq was released in May 1989.

More ›