Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cheath
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
100 ms
·
1.
▲
by
cheath
3y ago
Context: I grew up in this area and have hunted there my whole life. The land is very much so not "empty" -- sure, there aren't condos, but it is owned by people and those people get economic gain from it predominantly throug
2.
▲
by
cheath
4y ago
This is an obscure suggestion that is probably wrong. But you mentioned that it belongs to a family member which made me wonder -- Is it possible that your "primary" calendar is classified as a "Family" calendar and you
3.
▲
by
cheath
4y ago
I don't have this issue with the Ooni. I wonder what is going on. One thing to consider trying, heat it up at high heat and then when you put the pizza in, try turning the temperature down to a medium or low. I am wondering if it is po
4.
▲
by
cheath
4y ago
https://archive.vn/O2wk9
5.
▲
by
cheath
4y ago
Fair enough. Thanks for the thoughtful response. My aversion to bureaucracy makes me hate the idea of the government adding more red tape, especially on something as trivial as poorly written job posts. I feel like we learned nothing from G
6.
▲
by
cheath
4y ago
Agreed. they should. …But should that be the law ?
7.
▲
by
cheath
4y ago
Some of the responses here are a classic case of Fundamental Attribution Error - I see a lot of assumptions that imply that the employers must not be adding salaries because they are malicious or bad actors (which, of course there are some
8.
▲
by
cheath
4y ago
It is important to remember that we have a bias towards painting the past with "rosy retrospection". Life can just be hard and we tend to forget that about past events. It's quite possible you were just as worried about other
9.
▲
by
cheath
4y ago
What is the point that still stands, exactly? There are peaks and troughs with a clear downward trend. If your point is that in that trend, some years over 10 year periods look similar, then you would be correct. But in making that point, y
10.
▲
by
cheath
4y ago
I doubt the acquisition would have happened with the union intact. for Fastly in their diligence, that would likely be a dealbreaker. And I don't know the dynamics of the deal and where Glitch was with other options, but that could hav
11.
▲
by
cheath
4y ago
It was dissolved already. Source: https://twitter.com/keithkurson/status/1527310014771130373
12.
▲
by
cheath
5y ago
One of my favorite things about HN is seeing people come out of the woodwork to raise their hand and say that they worked on a system and give their insight. Thanks for sharing this perspective.
13.
▲
by
cheath
5y ago
self-pollinating would be a better description.
14.
▲
by
cheath
7y ago
They are when they are the canned variant!
15.
▲
by
cheath
8y ago
I see your perspective - however, the irony to me is that the alternative to urban density is to price out the people who are already there (decreasing their quality of life). Increasing demand while keeping supply constant will (continue t
16.
▲
by
cheath
8y ago
well, that I completely agree with. :)
17.
▲
by
cheath
8y ago
SF has a population density of 18,679 per square mile. NYC has 27,000. There is plenty of room, you'd just have to scale everything along with it. Also, for what it's worth, > population density = < net pollution. mass trans
18.
▲
by
cheath
8y ago
I love it for the ad-free videos. I honestly didn't even know that original content was a part of the offering. But I'd happily keep paying for this one feature.
19.
▲
by
cheath
8y ago
Search is something that (with the advent of Teams) we've been bolstering our investment in. We've updated to the most recent version of elastic (which unblocks us on a lot of improvements) and we have upgraded how we are indexing
20.
▲
by
cheath
8y ago
can confirm: that's definitely one of the features of this product.
21.
▲
by
cheath
8y ago
absolutely :)
22.
▲
by
cheath
8y ago
not yet. but supporting SSO options is on our near-term roadmap. however enterprise edition does support AD/SAML out of the box. stackoverflow.com/enterprise
23.
▲
by
cheath
8y ago
Sorry for the confusion. Your assumption is correct. $10 month total for the first 10 users (so, regardless of whether you have 3 users or 9 users, it's still $10/month). And then $5 per new user after that.
24.
▲
by
cheath
8y ago
yeah, that's definitely a huge product challenge for us! some things do work differently than stackoverflow.com to help with that - we built integrations to help surface questions to the right people in your team quickly (rather than t
25.
▲
Stack Overflow for Teams
(stackoverflow.com)
274 points
by
cheath
8y ago
|
154 comments
26.
▲
by
cheath
9y ago
This is all great info. One additional note. The best way to become a PM is to just start doing the job. Even if you're on a team with a PM already, offer to write a few of the specs. Or if there's no room to do that, then create
27.
▲
by
cheath
9y ago
As someone who struggles to get my Grandmother to doctors appointments and, as a result, she has high cancelation rates - I think this has the opportunity to be an incredibly valuable two-sided market. - Doctors are incentivized to have few
28.
▲
by
cheath
9y ago
I see an opportunity for a "Shopify for restaurants". Essentially an end to end SaaS solution that let's you do your own order management and lead-gen (and plugs into your own POS). though that latter part (lead gen) would st
29.
▲
by
cheath
9y ago
PM on Channels here. I see what you're saying. The honest answer is that we just really need to focus on making sure the product works well before anything else. I really can't speak with confidence about pricing, because we still
30.
▲
by
cheath
9y ago
PM on Stack Overflow Channels here. You make a valid point. :) And I can assure you, the success of Channels is predicated on a solid update to the way we do search (as well as better integration with tools you might already be using, like
More ›