chbint

7 ms·

1.
Meta scales back plan to track keystrokes, mouse movements after staff uproar(nypost.com)
2 points by chbint 2mo ago|0 comments
2.
Google patent of an identification method for Tor Over VPN(patents.google.com)
5 points by chbint 2mo ago|0 comments
3.
China issues 'backdoor' security alert over Anthropic's Claude Code(reuters.com)
6 points by chbint 2mo ago|1 comments
4.
AI assistants can be hijacked and manipulated by inaudible sounds(arxiv.org)
3 points by chbint 4mo ago|0 comments
5.
“Too dangerous to release” or just too expensive?(kingy.ai)
149 points by chbint 4mo ago|177 comments
6.
DJI Romo robovac had security so poor, this man remotely accessed thousands(theverge.com)
4 points by chbint 6mo ago|1 comments
7.
by chbint 6mo ago
Claude Code was used to do the reverse engineering. Not hard to see how an AI agent could achieve something similar even as a step towards some innocently established goal. Poor security + hacker-like capacities for anyone using an AI agent
8.
by chbint 6mo ago
I suspect his diagnostic is pretty accurate, though. The bitter lesson came up when deep learning was already mainstream. The text discusses how that happened, and it can be the case that convenience beats accuracy. Accuracy is an epistemic
9.
by chbint 6mo ago
I like RSS and I use it, but this sounds like wishful thinking. Even the amount of human produced content is just too big for one to be their own curator. We have those few authors or sites we keep up, but other than that we must rely on ex
10.
by chbint 8mo ago
Their argument is not sound, but it is informative paying attention to what they consider "evidence" for AGI. A nice instance of a problem that seems peculiar to AI: it tries to define both its target phenomenon and how well it is
11.
Does AI have human-level intelligence? The evidence is clear(nature.com)
4 points by chbint 8mo ago|3 comments
12.
by chbint 8mo ago
I confess it was disappointing for me. Their main claim seems to be that thinking comprises pattern matching and pattern completion--allowing them to say that LLMs do resemble something we humans do-- but that's essentially the idea be
13.
Structural Representation Is Analog Representation(philsci-archive.pitt.edu)
8 points by chbint 8mo ago|1 comments
14.
by chbint 8mo ago
This has interesting implications for representations within AI models.
15.
Forgotten Polygons: Multimodal Large Language Models Are Shape-Blind(arxiv.org)
2 points by chbint 8mo ago|0 comments
16.
The unreasonable effectiveness of pattern matching(arxiv.org)
3 points by chbint 8mo ago|2 comments
17.
What makes math problems hard for reinforcement learning(arxiv.org)
3 points by chbint 2y ago|0 comments
18.
by chbint 2y ago
> You're basically arguing that the constitution is on equal footing with or inferior to the other laws. That's just backwards and to insist on this borders on gaslighting. No. I'm making the Law-101 claim that, according
19.
by chbint 2y ago
> Qubes is a good approach to an OS, but it's Xen security, not OS security, and I'd rather run a secure OS other than Fedora or Debian on Qubes. Not sure what you mean by "Xen security" in contrast with "OS secu
20.
by chbint 2y ago
I honestly don't think you'll be able to get very far unless the team is already onboard with the plan to switch towards a more asynchronous culture. If they lack the motivation, they won't bother improving their writing. Th
21.
by chbint 2y ago
Your understanding of censorship is fundamentally distinct from that of the Brazilian constitution (BC) because you clearly detach freedom from legal responsibility. In BC, freedom of speech is bounded by the law. That's why you can&#x
22.
by chbint 2y ago
Like I've said before, Brazil lives under the rule of a democratic constitution built after much fight against real dictatorship and real censorship, not the rule suggested by you here (which, again, absolutely no country in the wo
23.
by chbint 2y ago
Judges were aware of what the producers themselves claimed the content to be and how the content was being promoted. There were clear references to the elections and to people involved in the elections. Moreover, It's not like members
24.
by chbint 2y ago
Because there's an ongoing investigation/legal process and you need to prevent something bad from happening. Typical examples are: the risk of you running away to another country, the risk of you jeopardizing the investigation in
25.
by chbint 2y ago
I was about to make a very similar comment. I won't say I'll never switch to neovim, for a lot depends on future vim/neovim development, and unexpected things happen. But I do agree that vim's stability is priceless. It&
26.
by chbint 2y ago
> Where in the constitution does it say that you can engage in censorship of any kind, let alone political? Brazilian law does not consider preempting someone from shouting "fire" in a crowded theater a case of censorship. AFAI
27.
by chbint 2y ago
> I couldn't care less what the goal of the documentary was. (...) And I don't care for the judge-king's censorship of "misinformation" either. I'll judge for myself, thank you very much. But the Brazilian c
28.
by chbint 2y ago
Similar experience here. It seems like we can learn the a pattern of distinctions pretty quickly. That's telling.
29.
by chbint 2y ago
I believe this requires context: 1) The producers of the documentary in question are a politically active group and well-known supporters of Bolsonaro. 1.1) They are also known for producing (and earning money from) content that spread misi
30.
by chbint 2y ago
Seems logically equivalent. If you have the right to express your opinions (no qualifier here, so they can be popular or not), that means no one can do anything to you (unless you commit a crime, of course). Perhaps one could argue that &qu

More ›