chartpath

17 ms·

1.
by chartpath 3mo ago
Not to mention they will need to research how to make their models faster and cheaper to run in order to fit some margin within what people are actually willing to pay.
2.
by chartpath 3mo ago
Are there any indications that this will be possible? Consumer hardware will continue getting better but I can't see 512GB RAM in a MacBook Pro any time soon. I'm hoping linear attention techniques plus MoE will make breakthroughs
3.
by chartpath 3mo ago
Sure, and OpenAI, Anthropic, Grokkk are totally self-made and profitable.
4.
by chartpath 4mo ago
I find Mistral Medium 3.5 with OpenCode is perfectly fine if you're willing to talk to it in a more fine-grained way about actual code. For me that's fine because even with huge frontier models I don't like trying to vibe pro
5.
by chartpath 2y ago
Yeah same company. Clearly they haven't improved their guardrails in the last couple months. It's never the technology that's the problem, it's the owners and operators who decide how to use it.
6.
by chartpath 2y ago
We should pivot the culture to one that is pro-liberal arts again. These people know how to read and write better than STEMs in general. CS as the only path to programming was always too narrow, and often people with a broader education are
7.
by chartpath 2y ago
Some much focus on fine-tuning when it can actively make performance on reasoning and planning benchmarks worse (over a baseline of already worse-than-coin-toss). Why not give us nice things for integrating with knowledge graphs and rules e
8.
by chartpath 2y ago
I've never had a problem working https://pgtap.org/ into CI. I know the article title says "integration tests" but when a lot of functionality is done inside PostgreSQL then you can cover a lot of the test py
9.
by chartpath 2y ago
Kind of a tangent but I'm really interested in why statements like: > if you have carbon-based life forms, you will have water and CO2. ..can lead to statements like: > it is just way more likely than any other form I totally agr
10.
Artificial Intelligence Is Stupid and Causal Reasoning Will Not Fix It(frontiersin.org)
4 points by chartpath 3y ago|0 comments
11.
by chartpath 3y ago
How is wealth distribution wrong? It sounds like you are arguing in favour of inequality.
12.
by chartpath 3y ago
There's a third kind, which is when unscrupulous business managers or politicians use it to make decisions that they would not be capable of auditing for a rationale when otherwise required to know why such a decision was made. It&#x27
13.
by chartpath 3y ago
$10k is nothing for rich people. Just putting them in debt for it doesn't mean nothing of value was provided. The reverse would be true where poor people could be ruined, unless the value provided is worth significantly more than the d
14.
by chartpath 3y ago
There is a lot of synthetic content about academic subjects on YT now, and it's very low quality. I used to search for lectures to listen to while walking or driving but now need to wade through tons of enshittified spam. Even if it&#x
15.
by chartpath 3y ago
UK scored a massive own goal and are no longer part of Europe ;)
16.
by chartpath 3y ago
I've been wondering this myself lately. After using RAG with pgvector for the last few months with temperature 0, it's been pretty great with very little hallucination. The small context window is the limiting factor. In principle
17.
by chartpath 3y ago
I thought they already didn't use input data from the API to train; that it was only the consumer-facing ChatGPT product from which they'd use the data for training. It is opt-in for contributing inputs via API. https:/&#x2F
18.
by chartpath 3y ago
Just like NNs did to symbolic AI which is sorely missed to build explainable and ethical systems.
19.
by chartpath 3y ago
Thank you for saying it!
20.
by chartpath 3y ago
Search query expansion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Query_expansion We've done this in NLP and search forever. I guess even SQL query planners and other things that automatically rewrite queries might count. It&
21.
by chartpath 3y ago
I can understand why that framing would be attractive, but there is no real fundamental difference when considering JSONB/HSTORE in PostgreSQL, and now we have things like pgvector https://github.com/pgvector/pgvec
22.
by chartpath 4y ago
Even if that were true, LLMs don't give any kind of "handles" on the semantics. You just get what you get and have to hope it is tuned for your domain. This is 100% fine for generic consumer-facing services where the training
23.
by chartpath 4y ago
Especially if they were hired with remote in their original agreement. Changing the location of work would necessitate some additional consideration and a new agreement.
24.
by chartpath 4y ago
Haha, much better response than the usual "wake me up when it's replicated in humans" any time there is a mouse study shared.
25.
by chartpath 4y ago
Thanks! Great points about leading with some of our own vulnerability as a way to create psychological safety. Refusing bad direction to protect the team is always hard, because it carries the burden of articulating how that protection is b
26.
by chartpath 4y ago
This resonates with me. Also in management with a similar style. However, I'd like to take a little tangent from there in case you'd want to elaborate on what it means to "get to know" people as part of the humanistic ap
27.
by chartpath 4y ago
Using the same here from https://www.saaspegasus.com/
28.
by chartpath 4y ago
There is a tutorial up https://liveviewnative.github.io/liveview-client-swiftui/tut...
29.
by chartpath 4y ago
Totally agree. I once helped start a worker-owned cooperative dev agency, and discovered (naively) that getting investment was basically impossible because investors and lenders aren't interested in creative legal solutions that don&#x
30.
by chartpath 4y ago
At will employment is not legal in Canada.

More ›