charleszyong

10 ms·

1.
by charleszyong 1y ago
For software support, the software is open source, so the community can keep it going even if we’re no longer around (hopefully not anytime soon). For repairs, the components are inexpensive enough to simply swap in a new one, and you can a
2.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Dalton Caldwell: “Make a product people love; worry about making money later.”
3.
by charleszyong 1y ago
NextJS (and Vercel) is really easy to use ;)
4.
by charleszyong 1y ago
We will have a two-arm version available, as well as a kit for people to convert the current version to two arms—probably in August or September.
5.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Yes, we 3D print and assemble in San Francisco, and ship from there.
6.
by charleszyong 1y ago
You can sign up for email notifications here: https://vassarrobotics.com/newsletter It will probably be available in late July. We’re expanding the team, so we might be able to offer it sooner.
7.
by charleszyong 1y ago
I hear you, man. After using 7-DOF arms, there’s no going back to 6 DOF. I’ll try to develop a version and hopefully get it out in August.
8.
by charleszyong 1y ago
We’ll probably have an electronics-only kit available in late July. However, it won’t be much cheaper, as we’re running on a very thin margin.
9.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Kuka had this demo years ago: https://youtu.be/tIIJME8-au8 Nowadays, if you’re running a 2–3B parameter foundation model on a standard computer, you’ll probably get a rollout frequency of 1 to 10 Hz. ACT would be faster, bu
10.
by charleszyong 1y ago
I need to ship the current orders before taking the next batch, so it will probably be sometime in late July. You can sign up for an email notification for the next batch here: https://vassarrobotics.com/newsletter
11.
by charleszyong 1y ago
XLeRobot and LeKiwi are both great!
12.
by charleszyong 1y ago
The robot is only as good as the amount of time you’re willing to spend teaching it. If you put in, say, 20,000 hours and make "some" hardware upgrades, you can get it to do things like this: https://www.physicalintelli
13.
by charleszyong 1y ago
I’m running on a very thin margin here. I want to get the robot into the hands of robot lovers without them having to eat McDonald’s all month just to save up for it. (I did that once myself, and I strongly advise against it—it’s really bad
14.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Very good suggestion! They look really promising. I’ll talk to the company to see if the price will be acceptable.
15.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Interesting. Their servos seem to be PWM servos, which are available at a very good price. I would look into how to hook up all the servos—you’ll probably need an MCU to convert USB to PWM for each servo.
16.
by charleszyong 1y ago
The advantage of servos is that they can provide constant torque preloading, allowing the preload to be kept low (otherwise, the servo will overheat) but still sufficient. A spring might also be an option if designed properly. I’ll probably
17.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Yeah… the accuracy isn’t good enough. A gantry system is probably needed. There was one robot startup (Haddington Dynamics) figured it out how to do it at a higher price. Sadly they've been acquired and shifted directions I think.
18.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Backlash is a real problem. I’m working with the supplier to prototype a small batch with 20 to 30% less backlash, though this may come at a slightly higher price and potentially a shorter lifespan. If cost isn’t a concern, harmonic drives
19.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Thank you for your support! I’m actively working on the design and building the supply chain. In the next 3 to 6 months, I should be able to: 1. Keep the price similar while adding new features, such as a torque-controlled gripper. 2. Re-ex
20.
by charleszyong 1y ago
The servos we are using in the follower arms are capable of generating about 3 Nm of peak torque. This isn’t a lot of torque, and they can’t move very fast. If absolute safety is your top priority, you could opt for servos that use 7.4V and
21.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Sorry for being MIA for a bit. All 120 units are now sold out. I’ve created a waitlist at https://vassarrobotics.com/newsletter to keep you updated on when the next batch will be available (most likely in late July). Thank
22.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Which country are you in? I can set up the delivery option for your country.
23.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Sure! You can email us at hello@vassarrobotics.com As long as it’s within this year, I’m sure we can arrange it.
24.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Yes. You are exactly right. If you want the model to have some adaptability, you will need to train a policy like ACT or GR00T. Just a quick difference I need to point out as it's critical product spec: leader arms are using 7.4v versi
25.
by charleszyong 1y ago
I’ve just set up shipping service to the UK. You should be able to place an order now. Let me know if you have any questions!
26.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Very good question. Currently, I’ve only sourced power supplies that meet US standards. However, I’m confident I can provide a power supply that works for Australia as well. When you are placing the order, make sure you put the shipping add
27.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Thank you for stepping in. Yes, it’s 5 DOF and a gripper using ST3215 (12V for the follower arms and 7.4V—various gear ratios—for the leader arms). As for hardware features, we can’t add much to the current model since, as you mentioned, we
28.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Just to clarify, these improvements is for future models.
29.
by charleszyong 1y ago
Thank you for the feedback! Thinking out loud: • Adding one DOF to match ARX kinematics is doable, with a price increase of $30–40. • A tool changer is a great suggestion. A few of my friends are working on kinematic couplings, which would
30.
by charleszyong 1y ago
For hardware, folding laundry with just one arm is really hard. So probably you will need a dual arm setup. For software, even the best policy in the industry struggles a little bit (the arms they are using is about $10k each): - https:&#

More ›