Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
chaoz_
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
chaoz_
3mo ago
Agree, it's something that will eventually teach your developers to ignore points raised as it's mostly garbage.
2.
▲
by
chaoz_
4mo ago
There is something about using the most advanced tooling possible. Why would you pay for IntelliJ, if Eclipse can do the same thing a bit worse? You want to master your craft, develop "optimal" systems, understand where things are
3.
▲
by
chaoz_
4mo ago
What tool do they use for diagrams?
4.
▲
SWE-Rebench by Nebius
(swe-rebench.com)
2 points
by
chaoz_
4mo ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
chaoz_
4mo ago
I worked at a very large EU tech company, that spent a lot of effort (and moneys) to become DSA compliant. So, you're over-projecting here.
6.
▲
by
chaoz_
4mo ago
I simplified this argument to highlight that we’ve seen this exact pattern before.
7.
▲
by
chaoz_
4mo ago
If you're just building a non-security-sensitive frontend to validate market traction, it makes total sense to go full AI. The commenter working at a 10-person company getting flamed for not using AI to iterate aggresively against comp
8.
▲
by
chaoz_
4mo ago
Do you also inspect and study what assembly code your program was compiled to? // Obviously LLMs are non-determenistic etc and it depends on your domain, but your VP's point 100% makes sense if you folks are trying to cook up
9.
▲
by
chaoz_
5mo ago
It surprises me how JetBrains managed to lose such a great market opportunity. I don't think they ever going to be able to re-claim large chunk of developers who are now fine with thin VSCode-like + Terminal for non-JVM languages. Perf
10.
▲
by
chaoz_
5mo ago
Genuinely curious, is there any way to estimate amortization of Mac? I’d imagine 1 year of heavy usage would somehow affect its quality.
11.
▲
by
chaoz_
5mo ago
Solid q. I think the part of it is that it’s really easy to attract some “mass” (capital) of users, as there are definitely quite a few of idle Macs in the world. Non-VC play (not required until you can raise on your own terms!) and clear d
12.
▲
by
chaoz_
5mo ago
Fun question: can some (part of it) be a crypto token that I can buy? :)) That would finally be a crypto thing which is backed by value I believe in.
13.
▲
by
chaoz_
5mo ago
That solution actually makes great sense. So Apple won in some strange way again? Guess there are limitations on size of the models, but if top-tier models will getting democratized I don’t see a reason not to use this API. The only thing t
14.
▲
by
chaoz_
5mo ago
You absolutely could. It'd be cool (not easy from security/compliance perspective) to be able to deeply "scan" your prod-deployed app. There are a quite a few startups created by connecting relevant eBPF/OTel traces
15.
▲
by
chaoz_
5mo ago
What even is this claim? Telegram is compromised? Some telegram bot/group got compromised? Is there any proof of the global telegram issue related to amex links? Sounds like BS
16.
▲
by
chaoz_
8mo ago
I think that works well for smaller orgs, but in larger organizations (especially where department headcount growth is not expected) it might be more complicated and more meta/political. I wish that were not the case, but in reality, t
17.
▲
LLMs can't beat the easiest quest in Space Rangers 2
(nikitakutz.substack.com)
1 points
by
chaoz_
9mo ago
|
1 comments
18.
▲
by
chaoz_
9mo ago
I extracted text quests from Space Rangers 2 after Claude failed a simple riddle I gave it when playing. Ran frontier LLMs through the 'easiest' quest, got 1 success in 60 attempts. Humans don't really have any problems solvi
19.
▲
Testing Frontier LLMs on Space Rangers 2 Text Quests
(nikitakutz.substack.com)
2 points
by
chaoz_
9mo ago
|
1 comments
20.
▲
by
chaoz_
9mo ago
I extracted text-based quests from Space Rangers 2 (a 2004 Russian RPG) and tested Claude Opus, GPT-5.2, and Gemini on them. Repo: https://github.com/NickKuts/llm-game-evals
21.
▲
by
chaoz_
10mo ago
I agree. I never understood LeCun's statement that we need to pivot toward the visual aspects of things because the bitrate of text is low while visual input through the eye is high. Text and languages contain structured information an
22.
▲
by
chaoz_
1y ago
Ehh, pretty sad there's almost no information on FACEIT anti-cheat. One of the most impactful out there. Wonder if it's just the invasiveness that separates it. Valve can't replicate even part of it, while CS2 game modes are
23.
▲
Ask HN: Is there value in a "generalized" visual tool for agent workflows?
1 points
by
chaoz_
1y ago
|
0 comments
24.
▲
by
chaoz_
1y ago
"You can actually read up on how these things work." While you can definitely read about how some parts of a very complex neural network function, it's very challenging to understand the underlying patterns. That's why e
25.
▲
Ask HN: Why mining power is useless for LLM training?
5 points
by
chaoz_
2y ago
|
5 comments
26.
▲
by
chaoz_
2y ago
but do you think "next token prediction is enough for AGI" though?
27.
▲
by
chaoz_
2y ago
I agree with you so much, but he has a solid programmatic approach, where some of the guests uncover. Maybe that's the whole role of an interviewer.
28.
▲
by
chaoz_
2y ago
indeed my thoughts, especially with first Dario Amodei's interview. He was able to ask all the right questions and discussion was super fruitful.
29.
▲
by
chaoz_
2y ago
I can't express how good Dwarkesh's podcast is in general.
30.
▲
by
chaoz_
2y ago
that's very exciting. are you quoting same benchmark comparisons?
More ›