chagen

10 ms·

1.
by chagen 2y ago
We must have a different understanding of the English language. OP's sibling comment clarifies your original misunderstanding by saying > The California law I referenced grants me rights to the pay range information. You read that a
2.
by chagen 2y ago
> Not having access to something does not grant you rights to it. > You probably know a lot of things I don't, and some things that I can never know. That does not allow me to compel you to tell them to me. This is such a obtuse
3.
by chagen 3y ago
Nice, thank you for this. I was able to replicate your example: https://chat.openai.com/share/6d7e4c6c-a753-4ffb-a021-6d1f66... If GPT-4 has access to Bing, it has no issue, but if you ask it to answer without using Bi
4.
by chagen 3y ago
That was a nice read, but it looks like the article concludes that the "Reversal Curse" observed by the authors of the paper is likely better attributed to the researchers' methodology. Some quotes from that article: "As
5.
by chagen 3y ago
What you're saying was true for primitive LLMs from a couple years ago, but in my experience, any of the advanced LLMs today (GPT-4, Claude, etc.) have no issue with this. I'm open to changing my mind if you can provide any exampl
6.
by chagen 3y ago
What LLMs can do efficiently is crawl through and identify the secondary forms of evidence you mentioned. The real power behind retrieval architectures with LLMs is not the summarization part- the power comes from automating the retrieval o
7.
by chagen 3y ago
Can you provide an example of it not being able to solve the riddle with the conditions you're proposing?
8.
by chagen 3y ago
Did you not intend for people to conclude this to be your personal position? Because there are ways to communicate that more clearly.
9.
by chagen 3y ago
Ok, 100 senses could be too many for you to type. Maybe could you list 20 human senses?
10.
by chagen 3y ago
This was a great read. I especially liked how you can read the presentation below with the slides if you'd rather do that than watch the video. No issues with video, but sometimes I'm in the mood to read, and this was very satisfy
11.
by chagen 3y ago
"Definitely the result"? I think you might be confusing correlation with causation.
12.
by chagen 5y ago
Ada Lovelace's father was Lord Byron?! TIL
13.
by chagen 6y ago
Here's a thoroughly nuanced analysis of the causes and motivations leading to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: https://youtu.be/RCRTgtpC-Go
14.
by chagen 7y ago
regarding 2: I think they meant millionaires with more than $100,000,000.
15.
Spite House(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by chagen 8y ago|0 comments