cgio

11 ms·

1.
by cgio 3d ago
For practical uses they are there. Arguably the frontier models are worse for some of these practical tasks. And keep in mind, people will use maybe frontier for 1/10th of the work, planning and review, and go open source for rest. The
2.
by cgio 5d ago
I think that anyone who has not experienced the slow churn of driving a car with the engine light on for years, some duct tape holding something in it, is missing nothing. But I still feel like a child with a base modern family car. It is t
3.
by cgio 5d ago
I would argue people getting paid to play chess was a short lived phenomenon anyway if you put it in context. The transition there is less related to the introduction of chess engines and more related to the shift in the media landscape.
4.
by cgio 6d ago
I am almost convinced and really like the core idea. My challenge has always been, with regards to surfaces and essences, why would a pattern be reflected as a word in context versus as syntax in different languages or contexts. Why not hav
5.
by cgio 6d ago
Hearing that something is solvable is already a hint. I don’t think leveraging this knowledge is ethical. They could go after a different problem but didn’t.
6.
by cgio 7d ago
The times when people spent an extra brain cycle to avoid billions of second passes.
7.
by cgio 7d ago
I don’t know, a stab carries lots of bias in interpretation. We might be reflecting our conscious experience markers on a different conscious experience. And selectively so, e.g. lobsters welfare. From my perspective, this is the hypocrisy
8.
by cgio 10d ago
In Greek they are still atrociously bad, still feels like they translate an English thought. Nevertheless, the etymological insights they can give on words or Ancient Greek passages is making reading the ancients really fun.
9.
by cgio 12d ago
How to not learn from your mistakes and actually make them worse. I wonder how many valuable alliances they lost just because of that fear. Whoever was willing to sign was already probably not going to be a threat.
10.
by cgio 13d ago
I don’t think collapse is by itself a good predictor of change. People in collapse just bow easier. Change of this scale unfortunately comes from terminal and collective despair. Let’s not rule out either normal change, not every marginal a
11.
by cgio 14d ago
I don’t think it’s because of the pelican but rather because of the bike. Edit:fixed autocorrect typo
12.
by cgio 14d ago
An incrementally built response seems self referential to me.
13.
by cgio 23d ago
The solution for me is not to be more common. The solution is to create a very unique profile each and every time.
14.
by cgio 23d ago
For any critical workload a chip is considered trash after 5-7 years. They still run , of course, but increased incidents on platforms that are supposed to be 99.99 are hard to work with. Now if you mean there’s unused stock of those , that
15.
by cgio 26d ago
I don’t even think comments are useful at all given AI. I can ask my AI to explain a piece of code if I am stuck and I will get a reply in context of what I am looking for.
16.
by cgio 1mo ago
I am not sure of the premise. You can have a filter which takes garbage in and outputs the clean data from the garbage, a denoiser. Also your definition of slop is not specific to slop. Any input can be garbage, including this human sourced
17.
by cgio 1mo ago
You maybe work things out on the fly by matching against abstract patterns. Could this be an indication not of lack of memory but of specialisation in abstract memory?
18.
by cgio 1mo ago
The price will increase in secondary market.
19.
by cgio 1mo ago
We agree in intuition more than it seems you think we do. This paper is mapping the intuition to the philosophical discourse of substrate independence. Track its course from Putnam and Searle to Chalmers Shagrir and Anderson Piccinini, and
20.
by cgio 1mo ago
Relaxation time is not a defect (breakage) but an attribute of substrates. A claim that implementation is dependent on reliable substrates, is essentially the trilemma and its conclusion that introduces covariant substrate independence. Imp
21.
by cgio 1mo ago
I hypothesise in an informed manner. Paying for the Λ is what engineers in foundries do for us. This argument specifically is addressed in section 7: The natural objection — a substrate that realises A already has reliable transitions — is
22.
by cgio 1mo ago
An implementation map assigns computational states to physical states. It is instantaneous if its verdict for t is a function of physical state x_tau alone.
23.
by cgio 2mo ago
I wouldn’t call an instant as meaningless in a continuum. It is indeed, though, non primitive and idealised as traditionally in physics (the physical state at time t, given as the limit of arbitrarily fine time resolution). If I understand
24.
by cgio 2mo ago
Exactly the intent of it! Does not claim inventing any physics, just relating it to implementation in philosophy. The graded theory is a bit more advanced on the physics front but not ready yet.
25.
by cgio 2mo ago
My thinking, tangential to the temporal section, is an Implementation Trilemma, a CAP style theorem. An implementation map can be: 1. instantaneous and faithful, at the cost of depending upon substrate-specific persistence parameters; 2. fa
26.
by cgio 2mo ago
No one likes generating content. Many like generating income or status. It is a new era. The era of curation. I would predict shorter and weirder stories and meme style communication patterns outside normal syntax. Poetry e.g. is replicable
27.
by cgio 2mo ago
Fuzzy logic?
28.
by cgio 2mo ago
Arguably starts with Wheeler and “it from bit”. Zuse also, who predates Wolfram. For me it’s a little bit like calling the egg you hold in your hand the centre of the Universe while rolling on a skateboard.
29.
by cgio 2mo ago
Actually it’s Solomonoff. But it’s called Solomonoff-Kolmogorov-Chaitin. So Chaitin is among the few people entitled to call it something and AIT is real and less pretentious than using his name.
30.
by cgio 2mo ago
Indeed, that’s not about false positives predominantly. At least for me the key concern is if it’s giving a percentage when it looks like it calculates a Boolean and therefore implies more nuanced analysis than it does. Which explains the n

More ›